To write a Literature Review, you must first grasp how it is created. This article provides a deep overview of producing a Literature Review to make your research work publishable.

The Process to Write Literature Review

To achieve the study aim, the review of literature for a research paper must go through very meticulously produced foregrounds.

The most effective method to produce a review of literature is to have a clearly defined research target and purpose.

As you determine the objective and goal of your research, searching databases such as EBSCOHost, Google Scholar, ProQuest, The Lancet, Elsevier, Sage, and JSTOR for relevant articles and secondary sources becomes much easier.

Every subject has its database sources. The correct database confirms the correct source selection. Please take note of the databases for the following subjects, for example:

You must search the subject-specific database for secondary materials relevant to your chosen subject. Consider gathering data based on relevant keywords.

Books, peer-reviewed journals, bibliographies, empirical/evidence-based scholarly publications, dissertations and theses, conference proceedings and papers, or grey literature can be used as sources.

With pertinent research articles and papers in hand, you can begin with an article review. You must go through the following steps to complete this process:

Identify Familiarity with Your Research Topic

The earliest stage is to examine all the publications, research papers, and books, to identify the familiarity of these sources with your research issue, target, and objectives.

Reject any articles or secondary sources that aren't relevant to your investigation.

Analyze in Terms of Scholarly Context

Analyze each of the chosen articles based on their findings and conclusions. Make certain that all of the obtained findings are relevant to your study topic.

Separate Theoretical Content from Empirical Derivations

Sort the secondary sources according to their theoretical and empirical methods.

Develop an Appropriate Theoretical Framework

Identify the theories that will fit your study pathway based on theoretical discussions and applications to the relevantly related topic. Create a suitable theoretical framework based on the relevant choices.

Enlist Empirical Results

Make a list of all the conclusions that can be drawn from empirical study. This list is crucial since it connects your research to certain real-world realities.

Identify Research Gaps

Make a list of freshly acquired knowledge about your research issue based on theoretical and empirical derivations.

Determine whether the theoretical and empirical data can help you achieve your research goals. Strive to find answers to your research question.

Because of the uniqueness of your study issue, there will undoubtedly be some gaps between the completed research articles and your research objectives.

Determine the gaps using proper debating and persuasive strategies.

Writing the Literature Review

The purpose of the Literature Review of a dissertation is to get in-depth knowledge about the research issue.

It is also subject to identifying research gaps and conducting new research in the same domain.

When producing a review of literature, the following procedures must be followed.

Theme Specific

Make a list of the important themes that you will grasp or analyze in the Literature Review.

These topics should emerge from your research's purpose, aim, and objectives.

While reviewing the literature, keep the theme in mind. Do not begin each paragraph with the researcher's or author's name.

It will give the appearance that you are more concerned with incorporating researchers in the Review of Literature than with focusing on significant subjects.

Argumentative Approach

Secondary research papers must be evaluated based on their strategy to solve your concern in the chosen topic.

Stay contentious and analyze controversial factors to justify including the findings in the literature review.

Try to grasp the new concept introduced by the researcher or author. Provide a critical perspective based on similar findings by other researchers or authors. If you can defend it, make contradicting assertions.

Examine whether the obtained new declaration is consistent with your study aims.

Comparative Analysis

Always construct persuasive assertions by providing a comparative study of other scholars' points of view. You must provide the required arguments while comparing various points of view.

The comparative analysis must demonstrate that, while the researchers are not erroneous, they cannot be deemed the same when it comes to the themes that you are dealing with.

Provide an analytical grasp of the circumstances and compare them to similarly situated contexts.

Clustered Referencing

Provide a comparative analysis. Instead of simply describing what the researchers are saying on the relevant subject, strive to provide a grouped point of view. As an example,

Instead of:

According to Shaw (2015), management trainees should learn how to use social media. Hopkins (2018) noted that under legal processes, management trainees should be made aware of social media activity.

According to Anderson (2020), management trainees should be aware of the legal implications of using social media.

Consider writing:

Management trainees should be aware of all legal rules regarding the use of social media (Shaw, 2015; Hopkins, 2018; Anderson, 2020).

Logical Connectivity

Most research papers are rejected if the research fails to maintain a logical relationship between the paragraphs.

Your work should always end with identical context and words, and the same should be utilized at least once at the beginning of the next paragraph.

The research method will become more synchronized as a result of this. It is always recommended that you divide your Literature Review into subheadings.

Because these subheadings will function under specified headings, the logical linkage is simple to build.

Justifications for Research Gaps

A Literature Review seeks to gather all types of material relevant to the research issues. However, there are still relevant gaps that the previous researcher has not addressed.

These gaps may be closed by the current researcher, increasing the relevance of the current research.

In this regard, the detection of acceptable gaps becomes mandatory.

However, it is equally critical that the discovered gaps be backed by acceptable justification.

You must demonstrate that you have searched numerous scholarly publications and have yet to find an answer to your research issue.

Conclude with Scopes for Methodology

It is necessary to include a conclusion at the end of the Review of the Literature. This conclusion should summarise all of the deductions and knowledge gained from previous studies.

You must also justify the need for an acceptable research approach to matching the current research relevance.

Write a Literature Review with a thorough comprehension of your research issue and arm yourself with a wide range of theoretical and empirical knowledge to support the relevance of your findings.