why do democracies appear not to fight wars with each other? Is the democratic theory correct?

 

I need 5 references dated 2012 to present

why do democracies appear not to fight wars with each other?

Democracies, according to the democratic peace theory, are wary of engaging in armed confrontation with other democracies that they identify. Several elements are seen as inspiring peace between democratic governments by proponents of the democratic peace hypothesis. The democratic peace theory posits that liberal and republican democracies are less likely to go to war with one another than other forms. Democratic peace is "monadic," "dyadic," and "systemic," with "monadic" (democracies are generally more peaceful in their foreign relations) and "dyadic" (democracies do not go to war with other democracies) variations (more democratic states in the international system makes the international system more peaceful).

For example, it is anticipated that democratic publics are more dovish in their interactions with other democracies, and that democratically elected leaders are more prone to turn to peaceful resolutions in disagreements (both in domestic politics and international politics). When it comes to structural or institutional restraints, it's seen to be difficult for democratic leaders to wage war unless there is a clearly advantageous benefit-to-cost ratio.

It is difficult for democratic leaders to organize for war and launch surprise strikes because of these structural limits and the public character of democratic politics. This lowers fear and unintentional escalation to war.

Step-by-step explanation

Is the democratic theory correct?

Yes it is and it's explained as follows;

Democratic theory is a well-established subfield of political theory that focuses on the definition and meaning of democracy, as well as the moral underpinnings, obligations, difficulties, and overall desirability of democratic administration. Democratic theory.