QUESTION 1 A hotel was attempting to take advantage of the limiting liability statue and posted notice of a safe and also had safes for use in each room a) The hotel's liability will be limited to the amount stated in the statute b) The hotel's liability wont be limited and the hotel will remain liable c) The hotel's liability will be limited only if the guest uses the safe d) The hotel's liability wont be limited because the safe is not in the lobby   QUESTION 2 What is the term estoppel? a) A legal term that means the hotel has lost its limited liability for some reason, usually because the hotel promised to be fully liable for the amount of the items b) A legal term that means the guest is estopped from suing for the full value or their items if stolen c) A legal term that us used in pedestrian walk ways to stop pedestrians from using that section of the walkway d) A legal term that means the hotel offers rooms on a yearly basis only QUESTION 3 In the case of Fennema v

Subject:ManagementPrice:9.82 Bought3

Share With

QUESTION 1
A hotel was attempting to take advantage of the limiting liability statue and posted notice of a safe and also had safes for use in each room
a) The hotel's liability will be limited to the amount stated in the statute
b) The hotel's liability wont be limited and the hotel will remain liable
c) The hotel's liability will be limited only if the guest uses the safe
d) The hotel's liability wont be limited because the safe is not in the lobby
 
QUESTION 2
What is the term estoppel?
a) A legal term that means the hotel has lost its limited liability for some reason, usually because the hotel promised to be fully liable for the amount of the items
b) A legal term that means the guest is estopped from suing for the full value or their items if stolen
c) A legal term that us used in pedestrian walk ways to stop pedestrians from using that section of the walkway
d) A legal term that means the hotel offers rooms on a yearly basis only

QUESTION 3
In the case of Fennema v. Howard Johnson Co., what type of car was the plaintiff driving?
a) Mustang
b) Camero
c) Charger
d) Pinto

 

QUESTION 4
In the case of Bhattal v. Grand Hyatt - New York was the hotel able to use the limiting liability statute
a) Yes because the individual was classified as a guest
b) yes because the hotel was dealing with a foreign aircraft crew
c) No because even though the hotel had complied with the limiting liability statutes, the statute only applies if the hotel is not otherwise negligent
d) No because the hotel failed to get the guests' signature on the required paperwork

QUESTION 5
The necessary elements of a bailment are:
a) Concept / retention / return / damage
b) A notarized document / Delivery of possession /  Acceptance of possession / personal property
c) Time / concept / retention / return
d) Person property / delivery of possession / acceptance of possession / agreement