question archive The authors discuss various deficit theories in this week's chapter on culture
The authors discuss various deficit theories in this week's chapter on culture
Subject:EnglishPrice:9.82 Bought3
The authors discuss various deficit theories in this week's chapter on culture. The first of these theories is the genetic deficit, which views genes as the indicator of one's ability to learn (Ovando et al., 2018). Belief in the genetic deficit is damaging to education of the language minority student because the standard of measurement is always gauged by the language majority students (Delpit, 1995 as cited in Ovando et al., 2018). The second of the deficit theories is the cultural deficit, which views poor school performance of minority groups is a result of one's culture. The belief that low SES language minority students have language and literacy factors which impede on their scholarly advancement is currently still perpetuated by some educators (Ovando et al., 2018). The implication of the various "deficit theories" discussed by the authors on the educational achievement of minority language students is the viewpoint that there is something wrong with the student, rather than looking at their uniqueness (Ovando et al., 2018), doing so may lead to teacher's lowering their academic expectations of these students and in turn it stifles the educational achievement of minority language students. An argument that would render both theories as flawed would be: how do these researchers explain the groups viewed as genetically and culturally deficient, having a high academic achievement in their native countries? How come there seems to be an absence of deficiency until the students arrive in the United States and are measured against an ethnocentric standard? The answer would be highlighting that both of these deficit theories are flawed because genetics and/or cultures do not dictate the intellectual capacity of individuals. Questions: Read the reader's response and critique his or her answer. What are your thoughts or opinions? Do you agree or disagree? Why or why not? What can you add to extend the conversation?
Purchase A New Answer
Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts
GET A QUOTE
Answer Preview
The plain argument that ones genetic factor and cultural factors can impede an individual from learning concurrently with other learners in the word, and pause intellectual deficits it plainly untrue. I disagree with the theory in totality. Looking at the theory placed forward in this case, it lacks basis to substantiate the claims that any individual who flies to study abroad is incapable of competing in a healthy manner academically, as a result of their innate and inherent deficits. Why must be be the standard of measure are other learners who are already established in the states?
While it might be true that some learners do not meet the standards expected performance, such failures cannot be attributed to ethnography and genetics. There is a whole lot of issues that can cause failure in an individual. constant and consistent racial harassment can also lead learners to fail. The change in environment as well as home sickness might also pause a threat to a learners' performance contracting index.
Step-by-step explanation
The aspect of a learner's performance contracting index is one that must be looked at in all spheres of life. It is not enough to simply conclude that one is a failure without a proper vestation into what exactly is the case of such failure.
Even when an individual becomes successful in life, we also must look into how the person manages to become successful in their life time goals. The theory of cultural deficit and genetic deficit is therefore only a racial projection in the field of academia.
