Section 1: do a critical analysis of key personal competences needed for the twenty-first century and adopt appropriate manners in different contexts (business, social events, online or social media,

Subject:BusinessPrice:16.89 Bought3

Share With

Section 1: do a critical analysis of key personal competences needed for the twenty-first century and adopt appropriate manners in different contexts (business, social events, online or social media,...) (extension: 700-1000 words)

- Section 2: develop and draw the mind map of your personal development plan (PDP) in five years from now. In this case: identify your personal competence as package of skills, knowledge and values. Identify and assess the different elements that enhance your self-awareness and self- management, wich support self-confidence and efficacy. (extension: 700-1000 words)

PPD221 CRAFTING YOUR FUTURE 2. Personal and professional Development 2 Task brief & rubrics Task: The task will have 2 sections: - Section 1: do a critical analysis of key personal competences needed for the twenty-first century and adopt appropriate manners in different contexts (business, social events, online or social media,…) (extension: 700-1000 words) Section 2: develop and draw the mind map of your personal development plan (PDP) in five years from now. In this case: identify your personal competence as package of skills, knowledge and values. Identify and assess the different elements that enhance your self-awareness and selfmanagement, wich support self-confidence and efficacy. (extension: 700-1000 words) Details of the task to do: • • • individual task the task will be submitted in a .pdf document, uploaded to Moodle course (via Turnitin). Use critical thinking skills to argue and justify your ideas and arguments. Also, you should to demonstrate that you have used references and materials used in the course. You could add anymore reference or evidence that you think could be interesting for the final goal. Formalities: • • • • Wordcount: no more of 1400-2000 words. Font: Arial 12,5 pts. Text alignment: Justified. The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style. Submission: Week 13, Deadline: Sunday 9th May 2021 (23:59 PM) Weight: This task is a 100% of your total grade for this subject (fail/pass) Rubrics Application (20%) Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Good 80-89 Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary. Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Critical Thinking (30%) Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors. Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references. Communication (20%) Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck Knowledge & Understanding (30%) Exceptional 90-100 Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner. Fair 70-79 Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary. Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident. Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant. Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident. Marginal fail 60-69 Student don’t understand the task and not answer the question. Neither not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary. Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident. Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources. Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident.