question archive STUDENT REPLIES STUDENT REPLY #1 Catherine Lynn Edwards Evidence is where facts or information is found that could indicate if a belief is true, especially in relationship with a crime
Subject:LawPrice: Bought3
STUDENT REPLIES
STUDENT REPLY #1 Catherine Lynn Edwards
Evidence is where facts or information is found that could indicate if a belief is true, especially in relationship with a crime. (Brandl, S., 2018). The chain of evidence is the process of collecting evidence, identifying what the evidence is and storing the evidence to potentially be used in court. (Brandl, S., 2018). Law enforcement and other types of people who work with crime scenes work alongside the legal department to ensure that the evidence gets properly handled and stored to potentially be used in court against the alleged criminal. Law enforcement is in charge of handling the evidence and storing it. (Brandl, S., 2018). There are scientist who are able to study the evidence and find clues within the evidence, such as DNA to help find out what that piece of evidence was used for and by who. (Brandl, S., 2018). The investigators assist in taking all the clues and pieces of evidence and try to make sound observations and potential causes for the crime. (Brandl, S., 2018). The investigators should try to avoid having a personal bias when it comes to trying to piece together the crime. (Brandl, S., 2018).
Resources:
Brandl, S. (2018). Criminal investigation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
STUDENT REPLY #2 Brittany Turpin
The key roles in the chain of evidence are the police officer, the property room clerk, and the prosecutor. The police officer is the first piece of evidence in the chain. At a crime scene, it is the duty of the police officer to gather and preserve evidence. The chain of custody of the evidence must be upheld, and it must be securely stored, according to the property room clerk. The burden of presenting the evidence in court and demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime rests with the prosecutor. The police officer is the first piece of evidence in the chain. At a crime scene, it is the duty of the police officer to gather and preserve evidence. This entails gathering both eyewitness testimony and tangible proof like fingerprints, DNA samples, and bloodstains. To guarantee that all of the evidence is acceptable in court, the police officer must record the chain of custody for every piece of information gathered. It is up to the prosecutor to present the evidence in court and prove without a shadow of a doubt that the defendant was the one who committed the crime. The prosecutor will work closely with the police officer and the clerk in charge of the evidence room to ensure that all of the evidence is authenticated correctly and may be used in court. In addition to this, the prosecutor will question witnesses from the opposing side and argue motions to exclude or suppress particular sorts of evidence.
At the crime site, the police officer is in charge of gathering and protecting the evidence. The officer must be careful to avoid tainting or damaging any evidence since doing so could prevent the admission of that evidence in court. In addition, the officer will gather any additional data that may be pertinent to the case, such as witness statements. Evidence must be recorded and kept in the property room by the property room clerk. The clerk is responsible for making sure all evidence is labeled correctly and kept in a safe place. The prosecutor is responsible for presenting evidence in court. The prosecutor must select which pieces of evidence will be most helpful to the case and present them in a way that is clear and convincing to the jury. The prosecutor may also cross-examine witnesses and argue against opposing counsel's interpretation of the evidence.
Law enforcement is primarily responsible for the correct management of evidence. This is because law enforcement is in charge of conducting investigations into crimes and gathering evidence. A criminal case or even an investigation could be jeopardized if they handle the evidence improperly. To guarantee that evidence is handled correctly, law enforcement must take several actions. They must first meticulously gather evidence at the crime scene. All the evidence must then be listed and labeled so that it may be found later on with ease. After the evidence is gathered, it needs to be kept in a safe place where it cannot be tampered with or damaged. Neglecting to take any of these actions could have negative effects. For instance, improper evidence gathering could result in contamination or loss, making it far more difficult to use in an inquiry or legal proceeding.
A case can be streamlined and made simpler to solve if it is assumed that the evidence gathered by law enforcement is accurate and leads to sound findings. This is because detectives will know exactly where to go for more information and what lines of inquiry to take. If these hypotheses prove to be incorrect, it could complicate the case and make it more challenging to solve. Investigators may go down dead ends and overlook crucial clues as a result of inaccurate preconceptions. When assumptions by law enforcement result in incorrect conclusions, this complicates the situation even further. Investigators may focus their attention on the incorrect suspect, for instance, if they believe a piece of evidence to be incriminating when it is not.