Solution for QID #111078: Gilbert et al. (2016) argue that the Open Science Collaborat | StudyHelpMe

Gilbert et al. (2016) argue that the Open Science Collaboration (OSC) made at least three errors in their study and consequently the OSC estimate of replicability is pessimistic.  Summarise any TWO errors Gilbert et al. believe the OSC made.  If these "errors" explain replication failure, does this mean psychological research trustworthy or do these errors themselves present new problems for psychological research (i.e., research is NOT trustworthy)? Explain your answer.