question archive Does cashing out the self in terms of inalienable property relations really succeed in telling us in an exhaustive fashion what the self is and how we relate to it? Or might such an account merely be an expedient strategy, favored by economists and other social scientists, for suggesting ways and means to try and find a place for 'the self' within a neo-liberal late-capitalistic scheme of property rights and relations?
Does cashing out the self in terms of inalienable property relations really succeed in telling us in an exhaustive fashion what the self is and how we relate to it? Or might such an account merely be an expedient strategy, favored by economists and other social scientists, for suggesting ways and means to try and find a place for 'the self' within a neo-liberal late-capitalistic scheme of property rights and relations?
Subject:PhilosophyPrice: Bought3
Does cashing out the self in terms of inalienable property relations really succeed in telling us in an exhaustive fashion what the self is and how we relate to it? Or might such an account merely be an expedient strategy, favored by economists and other social scientists, for suggesting ways and means to try and find a place for 'the self' within a neo-liberal late-capitalistic scheme of property rights and relations?
