question archive All courts have an "independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party
All courts have an "independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party
Subject:LawPrice: Bought3
All courts have an "independent obligation to determine whether subject-matter jurisdiction exists, even in the absence of a challenge from any party." Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500, 514 (2006) (citing Ruhgras AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 583 (1999)) (jurisdiction upheld).
Is this true for state courts too, or just for federal? Please cite answer.
