question archive How should the nominations process work for Supreme Court justices? For instance: Should a given administration be limited to the number of Supreme Court justices they are able to nominate in a given term? Should the size of the Court be reduced or expanded permanently for non-political reasons? Should justices serve for life? Should the system be redesigned to guarantee some sort of ongoing partisan balance on the Court? Should the public be allowed to vote directly for Justices, as they often do for state judges? Should the Supreme Court expand in size? Or Should the Supreme Court stay the same with no change, and if so, why?
How should the nominations process work for Supreme Court justices? For instance: Should a given administration be limited to the number of Supreme Court justices they are able to nominate in a given term? Should the size of the Court be reduced or expanded permanently for non-political reasons? Should justices serve for life? Should the system be redesigned to guarantee some sort of ongoing partisan balance on the Court? Should the public be allowed to vote directly for Justices, as they often do for state judges? Should the Supreme Court expand in size? Or Should the Supreme Court stay the same with no change, and if so, why?
Subject:PhilosophyPrice: Bought3
How should the nominations process work for Supreme Court justices?
For instance:
Should a given administration be limited to the number of Supreme Court justices they are able to nominate in a given term? Should the size of the Court be reduced or expanded permanently for non-political reasons?
Should justices serve for life?
Should the system be redesigned to guarantee some sort of ongoing partisan balance on the Court?
Should the public be allowed to vote directly for Justices, as they often do for state judges?
Should the Supreme Court expand in size?
Or
Should the Supreme Court stay the same with no change, and if so, why?
