case law: Smith v

Subject:UnrecognizedPrice: Bought3

Share With

case law: Smith v. Arizona -22-899- Right of Confrontation/6th Amendment The brief should be in your own words and your own work. it should be a 6-page precedent /brief. Precedent-2 pages and the Brief -4 pages in APA format. The brief should include the following: Case name and citation Precedent-A very short essay about criminal procedure before your case was decided. Please discuss what was happening on the street or in interrogations before this decision. (Present the legal precedent.) All statements should be backed with case law/ scholarly articles. Facts- In your own words after you have read the case and all briefs associated with the case. Procedural History- What happened in the lower courts Issue- The question the court must answer in the case Rule/ Holding- The answer to the question or issue. It is the court"s decision- some of your cases may be undecided so, give both sides. Reasoning- Why the court ruled this way/ How they came to this decision. How this decision will affect society- this shows me you read and understand the case and can apply the outcome to the world. Your opinion- Did the Supreme Court get it right? This will show me you read the case and you can analyze what you read. Also, include the balance the court had to deal with ex. autonomy or officer safety v. privacy Also make sure most of the sources come from: HeinOnline https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf8GcIAOaVY https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/01/court-appears-to-favor-arizona-mans-confrontation-clause-claim/ https://arizonastatelawjournal.org/2023/11/23/smith-v-arizona-yuma-case-sets-the-stage-for-long-awaited-review-of-the-confrontation-clause/