Bronx Community College has decided to terminate Professor Canals. The College sends a le±eroFering him $50,000 provided the Professor would sign a ³ull release giving up all claims hemight have against the College. Professor Canals signed it and out it in the nearest mailbox.When he got home, he received a check from the College for $50,000. Professor Canals wentback to the mailbox and got a mailman to give him back his le±er. He now wants to sue theCollege Claiming he never accepted the oFer.Is there a valid contract here? Please explain

Answer:

In the case of professor canals and the University, the contract is valid. To prove the validity one of the key element is the existence of the two parties. Second is the rewards which are acting between the case. In this case, the professor agreed to be paid 50000 dollars. In turn of even he even received the check which the university had sent. By receiving the check, it meant that already he had accepted the offer from the university and thus partially fulfilling the requirement of the contract. The third component that makes the contract legal is the claim to abide (Poole, 2016). In this case, the professor was to give 50,000 dollars, and in turn, he would drop anything he had against the University. By accepting the cheque, it meant that he had a commitment to the contract and thus he had to respect it. One thing that makes it even more complicated is the fact that professor canals want to commitment some element of fraud which is not allowed in a cont4cat provision. The fact that he had already signed the paper but went for them can be used to implicate him in a court of law, but all other aspects of the contract are very viable.