1)What is the major premise of the social bond theory? How do these bonds vary for each individual? What have been some of the criticisms of this theory?

Discussion Expectations:

For EXEMPLARY credit in the discussion, you should do the following:

• Utilize a paragraph structure. Each question should have its own paragraph with complete sentences. 
• Post a detailed response to the discussion question early in the week. I recommend you post the first time by Wednesday.
• Return to the discussion forum throughout the week to interact with your peers.
• You interaction with your peers should be detailed and thorough:
• Address your peer by name 
• Acknowledge something in their post that you connect to. Be specific. 
• Offer a personal experience of your own, make a connection between their post and the course material, and/or add something from your own personal knowledge. 
• Offer an opinion and/or question that drives the conversation forward. 
• Offer a complimentary close and include your preferred name as you would in a professional communication.

The major premise of social bond theory, is that basing on the theory, an individual who experiences elevated level of participation will consequently, create sturdier attachments and promise to social customs and, consequently, be not as much of probably getting into involvement of divergent or disparaging kind of behavior (Cummings, 2017). Therefore, that is the major evident of social bond theory.

However, there are four social bonds that vary for each individual. Firstly, is the attachment, this elaborates the strong point of the bonds and relationships that are present with person's social setting. The association regarding parents is specifically paramount, but other foundations like schools, actors and allies also have a duty. Secondly, is commitment, this explains the level of devotion spent in conservative values and aims (Breckin, 2019). According to Hirschi anybody who has invested resources and strength during objecting compliance is likely to lose more to deviant unlike anyone who has little dedication in achieving socially putative a aims. Therefore, strong connection can be found in attachment and commitment and compliant character. Another bond is involvement, in this HIrschi implies that who is exhaustively involved in conventional practices has lower time to participate in deviant behavior. Accordingly, accepted institutions like schools strengthen the self-control required to repel the act f deviant behavior. In nutshell, also we have bond of belief, as the name itself suggests, this refers to belief in the acceptance of standards and norms of the conventional society (Breckin, 2019). Seemingly, when this norms are adopted, consequently, they become tough to violate.

Nevertheless, this theory has been facing some of criticisms and these criticisms are; incentive to act defiantly is basically made as assumption, this makes people to criticize this theory. Also, individual motives to involve in deviant behavior are neglected in the bond (Cummings, 2017). Again, the four bonds are, to some point, not applied to variety of offences.