question archive State your own position Intellectual Property Rights and offer a defense for critical thinking

State your own position Intellectual Property Rights and offer a defense for critical thinking

Subject:Computer SciencePrice:2.84 Bought7

State your own position Intellectual Property Rights and offer a defense for critical thinking. Using the Ethical Dialectical Process of Thinking state what your ethical position would be on the moral question or dilemma or situation and why.

Prepare report based on the following task.

You should use some ethical principle and human value to decide what you think is the morally correct thing to do.

You must state those ethical principles and explain how they have been applied to the situation.

You should indicate that you have rejected alternative positions to your own and the reasons why you have done so.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Report based on the task:-

Ethical dialectic Position:-

  • Ethical concerns relating to intellectual property rights are most important when the defense of intellectual property is granted to commercially valuable products.
  • Intellectual property rights are rights granted to individuals by the development of their minds. They typically grant the designer an exclusive opportunity to use the invention for a certain period.

 

Offer a defense for critical thinking:-

1. The position on moral problems or dilemmas has been made clear.

2. Position protected by using-

  • Evidence in support of the decision.
  • Ethical principles used in the justification.

3. Evaluation of alternative positions and dismissal of those alternatives in favor of the decision offered because they are founded on ethical standards and values.

 

(1)There is an ethical dialectic for those who wish to come like well-considered positions on ethical concerns and moral dilemmas. In general, the moral decisions taken in the field of ethics will be the results of the phase of ethical evaluation and reasoning. Judgments should be distinct from pure statements of views or feelings. Arguments on what is morally correct or incorrect will not be easy arguments. Positions articulated using terms/expressions such as "right" or "wrong" or "good" or "bad" must be clarified in concepts of the precise definition of those words and supported by argument and facts.

 

Individuals should have some kind of morality that allows their choices on what is morally correct to do. Often doing the moral right thing doesn't make the actor happy except to realize that they did what was right. It is just the Egoist that feels will always keep the performer happy to do what is right. Well, the user would be correct to believe that most people around the world are Ethical Egoists (EE) as they believe about what best serves them first. And it might be best for the human population to experience life and evolve and use rationality and decide what each of us will live and die for. In an attempt to seek a conclusion as to what is morally correct to do with responsible moral agents, the explanations for the assumption in what is morally correct must be investigated.

 

(2)

Ethical principles:-

In ethical dilemmas, users call the dialectical approach of prioritizing and integrating all sorts of competing beliefs, responsibilities, and personal and social values to overcome disagreements among them dialectical theory.

  • Ethical Egoism:-In other words, the real concept to be followed will be EGOISM! Therefore, anyone who claims to use one principle on one occasion in one case and then another principle on another occasion will use that which is agreeable to that person and allows for the result desired by a person who claims several ethical principles.
  • Utilitarianism:-Utility-the largest amount of satisfaction for the highest number of individuals
  • Categorical Imperative:-Act according to the principle that users expect all other rational people to obey as if it were common law.
  • Justice as fairness:-Maxi Min concept: Maximize Freedom (Possibilities) Minimize Inequalities (Differences, downsides).

 

Do users want to make choices with yourself in the middle or do users want to THINK and come up with a theory that is consistent with the principles that users can use to make moral decisions and seek and persuade others to follow it as well so that moral differences can be resolved? EE lacks logic in that there is no continuity of universalization. This can not settle moral disputes because there is no consensus on the GOOD principle between EE's in a dispute. RESULT: Control and violence. Attempts are made to recognize the principle that will ideally fit, the principle that has the least drawbacks, and ideally to find the principle that is better suited to the demands of the present world dilemma and that is right to put human beings on a course of behavior that reflects the core values of the human society.

 

(3)

During the objective analysis of claims or positions on moral problems, there is a kind of evaluation of the arguments, as the concepts used in the claim are applied to cases either real or hypothetical, to determine how well they suit the situation and to overcome disputes, or whether they give rise to more difficulties.

 

Responses or positions reached through the dialectical inquiry and evaluation process would be subject to ongoing analysis and critique process in which human beings must find as many alternatives as possible. So long so people have a good sense of morality and values and can reason, they can use their analytical forces to assess and re-examine moral principles and ethical standards.

 

The fact that the dialectical process does not create a single conclusive, absolute, and eternally permanent stance on moral issues and the resolving of moral dilemmas ought not be prevented in any manner. Responses to the social issues that people's cultures in this world have been encouraged to tackle have proven to need time-frame updates and adaptations.

 

In protection of the position to be advocated as the favored position on the moral argument, an argument deserves to be done. This position is then debated by those who bring different standards or hold the same principles in a different order and who may apply different ethical standards, refusing one or another for purposes that should be specified. The cycle continues unless more people believe that one position is the best of the options.

Step-by-step explanation

Intellectual Property Rights:-

Ethical problems related to the intellectual property also occur in IPRO research as to how the efforts of the group leader will be calculated and compensated if the research project resulted in a patent, how businesses, consultants and other organizations may claim trade secrets as a result of projects funded by them, and property rights and privacy arrangements between businesses.

 

Benefits:-

  • Provides exclusive access to the founder or inventor.
  • Encourages people to exchange and distribute data and information instead of keeping it private.
  • Helps with social and financial growth.
  • Provides legal security and allowed users to to execute the work.

 

Dialectical Principlism:-

Even forensic often face complicated circumstances of forensic research in which ethical dilemmas. They want to decide the most ethical move, but the best option is not obvious. Promoting equity is a prime concern in forensic positions, with secondary tasks including as conventional biomedical principles and private values such as community security, fighting inequality and responding to cultural issues that, in extreme cases, affect or even overwhelm the probable main job.

 

Each person would consider the benefits and drawbacks, the weaknesses and strengths, and decides to be consistent with the values of that individual.

  • Slow.
  • Agonizing.
  • Non-arbitrary.
  • Promoting courage.
  • Methodical.

 

It is to be hoped that by considering the different theories and analyzing how they can be applied to specific circumstances and dilemmas involving structures and practices, each individual would become more aware of their fundamental values and which of the concepts is more in alignment with what they feel to be good. Such a theory may act as a source of moral instruction.