question archive Carlos went to a fish shop and asked for 1 kilo of two fresh prawns for dinner
Carlos went to a fish shop and asked for 1 kilo of two fresh prawns for dinner
Subject:BusinessPrice:4.89 Bought3
Carlos went to a fish shop and asked for 1 kilo of two fresh prawns for dinner. The fish shop owner explained that he had no fresh prawns but that he had some boiled ones, which he sold to Carlos. It turned out that the prawns weren't fresh and Carlos, after eating them, became seriously ill.
Required:
Does Carlos have any action open to him against the fish shop under the Australian Consumer Law? You must specify which sections of the ACL apply to this case.
Purchase A New Answer
Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts
GET A QUOTE
Answer Preview
No, Carlos does not have any action open to him against the fish shop under the Australian Consumer Law because The fish shop owner explained that he had no fresh prawns but that he had some boiled ones, still Carlos agreed by not denying to purchase the pawns.
So, no action open to him against the fish shop under the Australian Consumer Law.
Section 18 of the ACL prohibits a person, in trade or commerce, from engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct. This prohibition is not limited to the supply of goods or services and creates a broad, economy-wide norm of conduct.
