Hypothetical Facts: Sheila, a former secretary petitions a court for alimony. She tells the court that she will return to work as a secretary, but still needs alimony. Her former husband, however, argues that she is capable of earning a higher salary as a paralegal. Sheila is trained as a paralegal and is, in fact, capable of earning a higher salary as a paralegal.

Analyze under what circumstances, a court should refuse to take into account the higher salary that Sheila could earn as a paralegal.

1)Review and include discussion of the case of Crabill v. Crabill, 119 Md. App. 249 (1998) in the analysis.

pur-new-sol

Related Questions