question archive Reflexión Muchos países (countries) hispanos son designados "sub-desarrollados" (underdeveloped) o "países en vías de desarrollo" (developing countries)
Reflexión Muchos países (countries) hispanos son designados "sub-desarrollados" (underdeveloped) o "países en vías de desarrollo" (developing countries)
Subject:SpanishPrice:2.86 Bought8
Reflexión
Muchos países (countries) hispanos son designados "sub-desarrollados" (underdeveloped) o "países en vías de desarrollo" (developing countries). Pero considera la realidad: En el "2019 Global Health Index," España ocupa la posición #1, Cuba la posición #30, Chile y Costa Rica la #33; pero los Estados Unidos está en la posición #35. Los países hispanos producen sus propias (their own) series originales de Netflix y la mayoría de sus ciudadanos (citizens) tienen acceso a las redes sociales (social media) y la tecnología comercial moderna, como teléfonos inteligentes, WiFi gratis (free) y drones. En algunos países hispanos, la mayor parte de la electricidad ya (already) viene de fuentes de energía renovables, como solar, hidroeléctrica y biomasa. Dada esta información y el contexto del TED Talk de Chimamanda Adichie "The danger of a single story", abre el enlace (link): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Ihs241zeg=9s (save your work and copy and paste link on browser), observa el video y responde a las siguientes preguntas:
¿Cuál es el posible peligro (danger) de ver a México y otros países similares desde (from) una sola (a single) perspectiva - como países sub-desarrollados (underdeveloped) y limitados? In other words, what is the danger of a person from the U.S. having a "single story" of poverty and limitations with respect to Spanish-speaking developing countries? What are some negative consequences - for you personally and for the U.S. - of seeing Spanish-speaking countries from only one perspective? What will YOU do to overcome this danger? (Responde todas las preguntas en inglés o en español para recibir crédito completo
Purchase A New Answer
Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts
GET A QUOTE
Answer Preview
As Chimanda Adichie mentioned, a single story does not define a place, there are many stories that make up the truth and the essence of a place, and by understanding this we have been able to recover paradise, there are many stories, tales, anecdotes, events that they mark milestones and perhaps forge ideas and mental and cultural patterns, but they definitely do not determine neither the essence nor the value or the capacity of a country or a society, the clear example is given here, a girl who was born and raised in an African country absorbed by English literature and forgetting the details that are around her, and by discovering what she is capable of achieving by telling her story, and the true face of her country is giving humanity the possibility of knowing how they are them in their society not in one that is already drawn and idealized.
It is important to maintain the essence and continue to be a reference pillar of what each individual is, there are various dangers that threaten humanity, various causes, reasons and results, but actually knowing what is happening beyond our eyes will not give the possibility of defining with their own criteria what is really dangerous and what is still harmless, here the sympathy and support that each individual of their own origin gives to their ethnic groups or groups comes into play because although it is known in the union there is strength, and not letting the danger of a unique story flood our minds and criteria, let us keep the doors of knowledge and discernment open to understand, respect the life, opinion and feelings of humanity.
With nothing more to add and hoping that my answer is helpful, he says goodbye to you: Mendoza., P. (2020): "
