question archive Given the characteristics of literature and he hazards of translation, is Republic Act 1425 realistic? Why or why not?  

Given the characteristics of literature and he hazards of translation, is Republic Act 1425 realistic? Why or why not?  

Subject:HistoryPrice:2.87 Bought7

Given the characteristics of literature and he hazards of translation, is Republic Act 1425 realistic? Why or why not?

 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Answer:

Let's briefly review who Rizal was, what the Law of the Republic of 1425 implied and what the objective and intention of the law was.

RIZAL

Rizal believed that the literature of a people should be based on its own history and social, psychological and linguistic resources and thought that it could only prosper if there was an exchange with the rest of the world. For that reason, for Rizal, internationalization was not an option but a necessity.

According to Beatriz Álvarez Tardío, who has a doctorate in Spanish-Philippine literature, "Rizal continues to be a fundamental literary and artistic reference in the Philippines and Southeast Asia" and furthermore, she says that "he was a great writer, who has not yet found a place in the stories of Spanish language literature".

THE LAW OF THE REPUBLIC NO. 1425

Republic Act No. 1425 obliges all educational institutions in the Philippines to offer courses on José Rizal. In 1956, Congress passed this law, known as the Rizal Act, to include in the curriculum of all public and private schools, colleges and universities courses on the life, works and writings of José Rizal, particularly his novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo , authorizing the printing and distribution of these.  

The novels are incorporated into the curriculum of Philippine literature. Noli Me Tangere is taught to third year high school students, while his sequel Filibusterismo is taught to fourth year high school students. Both of Rizal's novels were initially banned by Catholic educational institutions because of their negative image of the Church and anticlerical themes. The Church continued to oppose the bill claiming that it violated freedom of conscience and religion and urged its followers to write to their congressmen and senators opposing the bill. After some time, on May 12, 1956, the law was unanimously approved.

OBJECTIVE AND INTENTION OF THE RIZAL LAW

The Rizal Law mandates the study of Rizal's life and work, as shown in section 1, which shows that his works were not a high priority in the country's educational system before the publication of this act of law. 

This Rizal Act calls for a greater sense of nationalism during a time of diminishing identity and aims to achieve the following objectives: to instill in the lives of the youth the ideals of freedom and nationalism, like those of the heroes who lived and died, and to awaken the sense of patriotism and nationalism in all Filipino youth and push them to apply the principles bequeathed by Rizal as solutions to the current problems. That is why it was written, so that the youth would not lose their great sense of nationalism, to free the country from the hands of others and defend the ideals and values for which Rizal fought. 

WITH THIS INFORMATION IN MIND WE CAN ASK OURSELVES:

IS THE LAW OF RIZAL REALISTIC?

First, we should know that during the time when that law was implemented, the deals of freedom and nationalism were very essential, as the Filipinos were still fighting for independence, and the country was still radically left wing. So, for many, this law was timely and still is very timely for today's generation, when culture has a lot of power and influence.

Secondly, as we know, all educational institutions are under the mission and right to maintain moral character, discipline, civic conscience and to teach the duties of citizens. For this reason, Republic Act 1425, makes an important point: that students realize that the culture and history of their country should be an important aspect of their learning, that aspects such as these can promote valuable and authentic moral and ethical values. So we see that yes, using our educational institutions to instill these values in children in their early years of growth and learning is essential.

But there are doubts and negative aspects. For many, the law is ineffective. Why? 

First, because Rizal's law is a way for youth to understand Rizal's vision, but today, when a Filipino is asked what he knows about Rizal, he will most likely tell basic information about it, without knowing what it really stands for. The knowledge of Rizal has been limited to knowing the streets that are named after him, or the characters in his novel, but it does not deepen the understanding of Rizal. Many university students of engineering or medicine, question the relevance of Rizal's theme in their careers.

As mentioned, the main function is to promote the sense of patriotism and nationalism of Filipinos, especially the youth, and to understand Rizal's values and morals to inspire solutions in today's world. But, some sections of this law have not been fully effective and implemented as they should be.

We know that this law was something essential for the Filipinos, a country whose culture is ancient and rich, but today, with the creation of scientific technologies, people have become indifferent and unaware. Lately, students have a negative attitude towards Rizal's works, due to the relevance of this topic in their courses because many times the lessons include memorizing terms in textbooks and not understanding what Rizal wanted to convey.