question archive Read the case below and answer the questions) Rose Collins was an accounts receivable clerk for a large corporation
Subject:BusinessPrice:2.84 Bought6
Read the case below and answer the questions)
Rose Collins was an accounts receivable clerk for a large corporation. She enjoyed the job and was generally happy with her workplace. Her employer had an extensive corporate giving program and supported employee voluntarism, in which she participated. For example, Rose volunteered to participate in the cleanup of a park near her office. It was an enjoyable activity and involved social interaction with many colleagues. Overall, she was pleased to be working for a corporation that was socially responsible.
Rose had reservations about the corporate giving problem—in particular, the annual United Way campaign. Firstly, she did not agree with the purpose of some of the charities covered by the United Way. Secondly, she preferred to contribute directly to the charities she supported and whose aims she endorsed. Lastly, she felt pressure from supervisors and peers to contribute. This last reservation cause Rose some anxiety.
She had been reading online about workplace charity drives. A poll of readers of The Globe and Mail found that 51% liked to support charity drives, 36% preferred to make their donations privately, and 13% felt pressured to contribute. Apparently, Rose was not alone in her concern.
Rose felt very uneasy about her direct supervisor heading up the campaign in her department. Although the actual canvassing was done by peers, she still felt pressure and anxiety. She was not sure how to say no or what excuse to make. She wondered if anyone would believe a statement that she had already used up her "charitable budget." She was also not sure how others would feel when she stated that she should be able to give to charities she preferred and in private. Even more troublesome was her concern about how saying no would impact her career.
The campaign made her very uncomfortable and she was even feeling guilty. Fun campaign activities were organized in the office and it was obvious to all when did not attend. The office had a goal to raise $5,000 and she was not contributing as expected of team members. Rose faced a dilemma and did not know what to do.
Questions
1)What are the pros and cons of workplace charity drives? What are the issues involved?
2)Does Rose have an ethical dilemma? State what it is?
3)What ethical principles might she use to analyze the dilemma?
4)What should Rose do, please explain your answer.
Please see explanation box below.
Please rate me helpful please. Thank you.
Step-by-step explanation
Answer 1= Pros of workplace charity=
It is aimed to provide help to the different needy individuals
The greater amount of charity can be collected
It makes the feeling of contribution to society among the workers.
Cons of workplace charity=
Rather than being the voluntary act, this can sometimes become the forceful activity
The employees may be pressurized by the peers and serious to donate even when the person is not willing to do so
The person wants to donate his money to some other cause
Issue= The main legal issue is to ensure that the collected fund goes to the deserving parties only. Secondly, the issue can be whether the employees should be pressurized to contribute to these drives or not.
Answer 2= Rose has the ethical dilemma is whether to extend her support to these drives despite having no budget for this type of activity for the present month and how she can tolerate the pressure of the peers and seniors. At the same time, whether she can force herself to contribute to those charity drives in which she is not willing to contribute
Answer 3= In the given case she can use the ethical principle of beneficence. This principle indicates that the person should look for the betterment of the others and must have some sort of sympathy and kindness for the benefits of others. This will create a positive opinion about the cause of charity in the individual.
Answer 4= In my opinion Rose should not come under the pressure of the peer groups and seniors. She should follow her feelings. As she thinks that contributing to the charity can put herself in some sort of financial trouble as her charity budget is already exhausted, then she should not contribute. Moreover, she is not inclined to contribute to the cause of charity collected in the organization.