question archive 1) According to Path Goal Theory, which style is appropriate when workers have low levels of skill, high role ambiguity and a low external locus of control? Supportive Directive Achievement Oriented Participative 2) Blanchard and Hersey's Situational Leadership style used which two dimensions to determine employee readiness? Effort and Efficacy Competence and Commitment Age and Ability Tenure and Tenaciousness
1) According to Path Goal Theory, which style is appropriate when workers have low levels of skill, high role ambiguity and a low external locus of control? Supportive Directive Achievement Oriented Participative 2) Blanchard and Hersey's Situational Leadership style used which two dimensions to determine employee readiness? Effort and Efficacy Competence and Commitment Age and Ability Tenure and Tenaciousness
Subject:BusinessPrice:3.87 Bought8
1) According to Path Goal Theory, which style is appropriate when workers have low levels of skill, high role ambiguity and a low external locus of control?
|
Supportive |
|||||||||
|
Directive |
|||||||||
|
Achievement Oriented |
|||||||||
|
Participative 2) Blanchard and Hersey's Situational Leadership style used which two dimensions to determine employee readiness?
|
Purchase A New Answer
Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts
GET A QUOTE
Answer Preview
Answer:
Ans 1: Directive
Explanation: In a directive leadership style, workers have low levels of skill, high role ambiguity and a low external locus of control
Ans 2: Competence and Commitment
Explanation: Within the context of Situational Leadership, readiness it is described as ability and motivation of employee toward a given task.
