question archive creating a thesis and an outline on Ethical Problems to Be Solved with a Code of Conduct of the American Psychological Association
Subject:WritingPrice: Bought3
creating a thesis and an outline on Ethical Problems to Be Solved with a Code of Conduct of the American Psychological Association. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. To give a brief definition of the case, it is necessary to mention that after a concussion, the patient found himself in a condition in which he could no longer rely on his cognition alone, but needed coordination and guidance. The therapist decided to help the client and disclosed information to an attorney and a friend after signing a release with the client. The counselor also attracted other people to assist Mr. Albertson as he seemed to lose his connection with reality.
Despite the evident fact that Dr. Jones was acting according to then Principle A of Ethical Principles of Psychologists, which states that beneficence and normal efficiency are the core aspects of work. As per the psychologists’ principle, they strive to benefit those in working relationships with them, as they remain careful to do no harm. Acting professionally, psychologists ensure high responsibility to safeguarding the welfare as well as the rights of individuals they interact with within the professional field as well as other affected persons (Jackson, 2012).
The First Noticeable Violation Concerns Privacy and Confidentiality
The issue is rather ambivalent because psychologists could view the therapist as acting in the situation of emergency, in an attempt to assist the client. In one instant, any intervention in a patient`s personal life is a violation of his life. However, on the other hand, a psychotherapist uses guidelines of the principle of the beneficence of a customer. Consequently, he in some cases needs to choose whether to violate or not to violate the client’s rights in an attempt to solve a problem (Prasko & Vyskocilova, 2013). However, Dr. Jones made a serious and responsible decision to have the client, who was already suffering from injury and demonstrated multiple cognitive deficits, sign a release to share his individual information with unfamiliar persons. The release was quite a disputable and problematic document because it was not likely that Mr. Albertson could evaluate adequately what was going on.
The reason is that he had trouble understanding concepts, however, such agreements could be made only in the condition of full patient`s awareness. The act could also violate the assessment standard to a certain extent.