question archive Identify the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions with a supporting example
Identify the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions with a supporting example
Subject:PhilosophyPrice: Bought3
Identify the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions with a supporting example. 25% Doesnot list critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions. Omitsmany critical success factors and provides no examples. Lists some critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions but provides no examples. Identifies the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions, each with a supporting example. Identifiesall of the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions withmany effective examples from personal and professional life. Identify the critical success factors using clear unambiguous language with a supporting example. 25% Does not list critical success factors using clear unambiguous language and provides no examples. Lists some critical success factors using clear unambiguous language and provides no examples. Identifies the critical success factors using clear unambiguous language with a supporting example. Identifiesall of the critical success factors using clear unambiguous languagewith many effective examples from personal and professional life. Identify the critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction with a supporting example. 25% Does not list critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction and provides no examples. List some critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction but provides no examples. Identifies the critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction, each with a supporting example. Identifiesall of the critical success factors in distinguishing deduction frominduction with many effective examples from personal and professionallife. Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. 25% Writing does not support a central idea in appropriate format. Does not use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. Writing supports an idea. Format is inconsistent, contains major errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics. Writing clearly supports a central idea in appropriate format and with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics. Writingis coherent, using evidence to support a central idea in a consistentlyappropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.Also attached is a outline for the paper to try to help.PHI 2100 U03a1 - Williamson.docx
