question archive From the scenario, analyze the general points between initiating civil procedures, the prevalent practices of these procedures within health care litigation solutions, and the influence of corporate structure on resolutions and subsequent legal precedents
From the scenario, analyze the general points between initiating civil procedures, the prevalent practices of these procedures within health care litigation solutions, and the influence of corporate structure on resolutions and subsequent legal precedents
Subject:LawPrice: Bought3
From the scenario, analyze the general points between initiating civil procedures, the prevalent practices of these procedures within health care litigation solutions, and the influence of corporate structure on resolutions and subsequent legal precedents. Defend or critique the use of the aforementioned prevalent practices in the multi-disciplined interaction required of 21st Century health care administrators.
According to the scenario, the general points of initiating civil procedures are: 1) a “Pleading” or written statement of fact and law / complaint filed with a court of law by a Plaintiff detailing the parties to the lawsuit, a cause for action and a demand for damages.. 2) Defendant challenges the Plaintiff’s complaint on legal sufficiency by initiating a pleading on its behalf called a “Demurrer.” 3) “Answer” isa “pleading” by the Defendant that admits or denies the specific allegations of the Plaintiff’s complaint. 4) A Bill of Particulars is a request for the itemization of the claims of which a Defendant can demand from the Plaintiff to determine what the specific details of the complaint are, in the lawsuit.
Analyzing the practices of these procedures within litigating solutions in healthcare along with the influence of the corporate structure is a comparison of authorities. Healthcare corporations have expressed and implied corporate authority, as well as the power of state statues. The influence of the corporate structure on resolutions and subsequent legal precedents are its emphasis on compliance and ethics. Healthcare Boards are governed and held accountable to certain liabilities and duties imposed by laws that can be enforced in legal proceedings. They are all required and held responsible for compliance with all applicable laws and standards.
I can defend the process of these practices as they pertain to the multi-disciplined interactions required of 21st Century health care providers as a sincere attempt to have a fair and equitable process in place to resolve issues. However, I would be remiss if my critique didn’t include the imperfections and flaws of those responsible for administering the process. The US Constitution is an example of a living documents that is worded eloquently that only applied to wealthy white male landowners although on it states “We The People.” This doctrine continues to be diversely interpreted differently and enforced by very flawed men to this day.
One can look at the current health care situation where in the “greatest country on earth” ideology is still being enforced over scientific and medical decisions by currently flawed wealthy white male landowners. So again, I think the process is good on paper, however I have reservations in its administration of law where the highest court of the land has decreed corporations are people and money is free speech. That specifically means that the poor, disabled and elderly; the very people that health care was designed for and suppose to treat are speechless.
