question archive What are two conditions to look for when coaching an ART sync meeting? (choose two) The program board is used as a big visual information radiator (BVIR) for the meeting Look-ahead planning and discussion for the next Program Increment (PI) is not occurring The Release Train Engineer is not vocal in the event Feature completion is not occurring within the current Program Increment (PI) as planned and re-planning of iterations is not occurring All the Scrum Masters, Product Owners, and Business Owners are in the meeting What are two significant risks that can be understood from the program board? (choose two) A Feature has an excess of dependencies and risks associated with it Team work in process (WIP) limits are being ignored No work is planned for the Innovation and Planning (IP) Iteration Features are being delivered at the end of the last Iteration Teams do not understand their Features and Epics At the end of Program Increment (PI) Planning after dependencies are resolved and risks are addressed, a confidence vote is taken
Subject:ManagementPrice:4.87 Bought15
What are two conditions to look for when coaching an ART sync meeting? (choose two)
What are two significant risks that can be understood from the program board? (choose two)
At the end of Program Increment (PI) Planning after dependencies are resolved and risks are addressed, a confidence vote is taken. What is the default method used to vote?
What is the call to action when promoting SAFe during a meeting with company executives?
What are two reasons to manage an implementation plan as a roadmap (choose two.)