question archive Hello! So our class is having a debate on Genetic Modification in Humans (GMH) and the two opposing group: one that recognizes the merits of a genetically modified human (GMH) or Pro-GMH, and; one that is against GMHs or Anti-GMH

Hello! So our class is having a debate on Genetic Modification in Humans (GMH) and the two opposing group: one that recognizes the merits of a genetically modified human (GMH) or Pro-GMH, and; one that is against GMHs or Anti-GMH

Subject:BiologyPrice:2.86 Bought14

Hello! So our class is having a debate on Genetic Modification in Humans (GMH) and the two opposing group: one that recognizes the merits of a genetically modified human (GMH) or Pro-GMH, and; one that is against GMHs or Anti-GMH.

 

I am part of the of the Anti-GMH group and I am asking if you can help us make our opening statement for the the debate. The Pro-GMH has already stated their opening statement.

 

Pro-GMH Opening Statement:

To begin, we want to pose the question, are we not ready for the man's big leap? From the day man appeared on this planet as the most intelligent being, what we have achieved is making life better and making it more comfortable through the eras gone by. Today, we dominate by the sheer power of our intellect. We have been improving the circumstances, mastering the environment, and modifying everything around us to meet our needs. It is now time to improve ourselves, our very being, enhance our very existence and not give up on the life plan decided by our genes. It is time to modify our very essence - OUR GENES!

 

Do not ask why? Instead, ask, why Not? We defined Genetic Modification in Humans as the deliberate, controlled manipulation of the genes in humans with the intent of making that organism better in some way. Recently developed techniques for modifying genes are often called "gene editing." Gene editing is a genetic engineering type in which DNA is inserted, replaced, or removed. For this debate, we would like to present the affirmative's side points.

 

First, allow us to tell you gene modification's most significant benefit: Disease management. About 6,000 genetic disorders, many of which are fatal or severely debilitating, are known today, and more to be discovered. Most of these disorders do not have treatment, and patients live with it for the rest of their lives. If we intervene earlier, even prior to conception, we can already prevent this disease from happening. Through genetic modification, we can also decrease the chances of passing a genetic disease to the offspring like hypertension and diabetes mellitus, which are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. It will not just improve the quality of life of the patient but also the people around them.

 

Second, genetic modification can enhance human capacities. Cognition, physical performance, and longevity will be engineered for humans. In theory, editing techniques would enable gene manipulation so that cognitive and physical traits on demand could be passed onto individuals. It will enhance the workforce of a country for a better economy and human resources. Moreover, it could also mean a longer life span by making humans more resilient that can change with the environment.

 

Last for the advantages is the potential to delay or stop aging. We do not mean being immortal but being physically at your prime throughout your life. Gene editing could delay or arrest aging; this has already been achieved in mice. Gene editing might offer the prospect of humans living twice as long, or perhaps even hundreds of years, without loss of memory, frailty, or impotence.

 

In terms of the advancement in technologies, one of the methods that can be used in GMH is CRISPR-Cas9, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, that makes targeted changes in the genetic material of DNA. It is highly advantageous in human genome editing as it is cheaper, faster, more precise, and versatile compared to other genetic modification methods.

 

Anti-GMH Opening Statement:

[in here, you will decide if you will accept or reject the definitions laid out by the pro-GMH group. You will then start to layout your points against GMHs and why they are a travesty to our humanity. You may also include the advancement and problems in technologies in the past decade and how they're used in genetic modifications.]

 

Pls do not give any rebuttals first, just points in ANTI-GMH and  advancement and problems in technologies in the past decade and how they're used in genetic modifications.

 

You may also include in the opening statement of the anti-GMH: disadvantages of GMH, scientific, social, and ethical implications of GMH in human, and consequences of GMH.

 

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

2.86 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

rated 5 stars

Purchased 14 times

Completion Status 100%