question archive What he means by this is having a reliable scientific knowledge is important with the advantage of not having the ethical issues that technology has in the previous paragraph

What he means by this is having a reliable scientific knowledge is important with the advantage of not having the ethical issues that technology has in the previous paragraph

Subject:EnglishPrice:2.86 Bought9

What he means by this is having a reliable scientific knowledge is important with the advantage of not having the ethical issues that technology has in the previous paragraph. He stated that it is science that shows us what the world is. According to Wolpert, it is through the application of science in technology is where moral and ethical issues arises. Topics such as human and animal experimentation, and genetically modified food have their own ethical issues as well as nanotechnology; a new time of technology that involves micro-robots that can help in medicine and releases dangerous chemical compounds to our environment.

 

>>>> Eugenics is the belief akin to selective breeding. People with desirable traits which are inheritable are being encouraged to reproduce while those with undesirable traits are discouraged. These are known as positive eugenics and negative eugenics respectively. It is a classic example of perversion to scientific knowledge because it violates basic human rights like the right to reproduce. "Scientific Racism" also raises due to the belief that humans with inheritable undesirable traits are seen unfit for reproduction and people with inheritable traits are. This could result with mindset that sees people that are fit for reproduction are superior to their counterparts.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

For the first arrow , it is clearly stated that the science makes everything that is in the world especially now we have a rampant invented technologies , and particularly the robots. Actually , it is really depends on your perspectives if you will believe scientifically or Biblically.

For me , in my opinion , I will not believe in this why ? in Biblically speaking , God is the provider of wisdom and He is too merciful to make our lives easier in this world. We are lucky that there are many people who have that kind of wisdom to invent something to help us in our daily lives. Always remember , that eventhough we have all the technologies in the world , still one day we will die and bring nothing. So we must be humble.

 

For the second arrow , its about controlling the humans to reproduce especially those inheritable .It is very wrong ,why? because it violates basic human rights like the right to reproduce. Sometimes scientists are go beyond imaginable study that tend to make the humans afraid about the conclusion. We all know that scientists are only believe in what they saw and what they have study systematically by applying the general principles of science . They tend to forgot our Creator , Who created the universe and us humans. The scientists can have the right to study whatever they want , but this term ? its a big no . You cant judge the person's future by looking in the present , and you can control humans as well. So instead judging ,why not educating the people about to what they have study and gather suggestions about it .