QUALITATIVE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 2 Jervaughn Reid Helm School of Government, Liberty University CJUS 750 Qualitative Methods of Research Qualitative Annotated Bibliography Dr

Subject:LawPrice: Bought3

Share With

QUALITATIVE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 2

Jervaughn Reid

Helm School of Government, Liberty University

CJUS 750 Qualitative Methods of Research

Qualitative Annotated Bibliography

Dr. Melvin Richards

May 26, 2021.

 

 

 

 

Author Note

Jervaughn F. Reid

I do not have any conflict of interest to disclose.

Any communication about this article should be articulated to

Jervaughn F. Reid

Email: jreid@liberty.edu

 

 

 

 

Introduction

This annotated bibliography examines the analytics, phenomenology, basic theory, ethnography, and case studies in greater depth. A summary of the methods used in qualitative research and how they contribute to criminal justice is provided for each process. Several government departments and agencies are part of the criminal justice system. The criminal justice system aims to restoring offenders, stopping crimes, and providing the victims with emotional support. Police, lawyers, defense lawyers, courts, and prisons are the leading institutions in the criminal justice systems. Criminology is the social study of criminality and how to prevent it. Criminology sees how it varies, how it is, and how it is in a criminal justice system. The five approaches to determining what is the best way for qualitative research used in criminology.

Glesne, Corrine. Becoming Qualitative Researchers. Pearson Education (US), 2015. [MBS Direct].

The author argues that qualitative researchers are trying to understand their actions and interactions. He starts by describing his connections to research. He argues that you should be familiar with his story to understand better and interpret the opinions expressed in his work. He says that the introduction also helps to contextualize and present different research projects he will address in his book by using personal experiences to clarify the methodological advice. The author says that his master's thesis was his first qualitative research project: Interview and Archiving Analysis of Rural Illinois Women Working the Land. The author helped Alan Peshkin to perform an ethnography as a Ph.D. student of a fundamentalist Christian school. In the area where the school was, Peshkin passed. He says that he and the second assistant stayed in school two days a week in a single academic year, watching from behind the school rooms and interviewing teachers and students in various sessions. Before beginning his doctorate, the author worked as an action researcher in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as part of Michael Quinn Patton's multi-nation Caribbean Agricultural Extension Project. The author collaborated with farming groups and farming associations to establish a national agricultural extension plan. The author says that he also worked there. The author returned to Saint Vincent to study and research ethnography in a rural town that focuses on youth, agriculture, and education.

As a professor at Vermont University, the author began teaching qualitative research courses (UVM). He says that Poets and novelists lament that they do not have much time to write when they teach literature. The author suggests the same approach is to conduct qualitative research. The author's research is limited to two sabbatical papers, one in Costa Rica and one in Oaxaca, Mexico, which are well-designed for short-term evaluations and life history projects. While the author was trained in traditional ethnographic techniques, he wanted to research people, not them, by the time he came to Costa Rica in 1993. The author has volunteered and worked for an environmental group in the small community in which he lived.

Copes, H., & Miller, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge handbook of qualitative criminology. Routledge.

The author argues that criminal justice and criminology possess various legacies of utilizing qualitative techniques to bring light to criminals' social control and nature. He adds that qualitative approaches date back to the nineteenth century as portrayed in Chicago university, influencing justice and crime. The author suggests that the research was conducted by listening to stories of offenders plus the justice functionary's system, which guides inquiry in academics and policy regarding crime control. Knowledge or information in criminal basis and decision making of organizations and response from bureaucratic have mainly been affected by ethnography or naturalistic inquiry. The author states that the qualitative methods used are essential when informing crime prevention, treatment, and control programs, especially during process evaluation and implementation.

Miller, J. (2005). The status of qualitative research in criminology. In Workshop on interdisciplinary standards for systemic qualitative research, Michele Lamont. Arlington, Virginia.

The author states that subjective researches were the core of early research into misconduct in particular. He adds that the Chicago School's practice of research in the area and its use of the urban scene as a social laboratory have led to many inquiries into errors and abnormalities (see Adler and Adler 1987). Since this exploration model in the broader field of humanism has been questioned, it is also undesirable for those investigating misconduct, especially in developing review analysis strategies and progressing observable methods.

The author argues that as an autonomous order, criminal science is indeed increasing later. He adds that criminal science has essentially developed in the US as a subfield of humanism and driving crime researchers currently live in social sciences and crime programs. The author says that crime analysts have been underestimated (with credible evidence). This has been one of the added variables of their autonomous turn of events since a long time ago. He concludes that this division is crucial to understanding academic inquiry and personal experimentation in criminal science in both areas and arranging the field in precise lines between the two orders.

Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health promotion practice, 16(4), 473-475.

The author argues that criminology has just arisen as a new discipline. He says that criminology started as part of sociology in the United States, with top criminologists now being trained in sociology and criminology. The author suggests that criminologists felt marginalized for a long time (for a good reason) in sociology, which was one reason for their independence. This division is essential to place the field in the historical linkages between the two areas and understand the consequences for the university study of crimes in general and qualitative research in crime. This division is essential.

On the one hand, the author says it is regarded as strictly descriptive (and therefore simple to implement), leading to the use of quality methods by criminologists who are not trained in the technique. As a result, qualitative data often appears as additional descriptive data, which adds "texture" and "flash" to quantitative analysis. Furthermore, he adds that narrative accounts may be interpreted as descriptive facts (or descriptive illustrations). Rather than inductively used for hypothesis building or idea refining within pre-conceived conceptual structures in studies that use qualitative data, most commonly interview data - but not qualitative methods. The author argues that such an analysis at several levels is problematic: it is incapable of advancing social research because data is not rigorously evaluated and reinforces the perceived usefulness of qualitative research in the formation and development of social theory. Investigative mistakes (or lack thereof) are often evident to a quality mind but are ignored by a wider criminal audience.

Tewksbury, R., Dabney, D. A., & Copes, H. (2014). The prominence of qualitative research in criminology and criminal justice scholarship. In Advancing Qualitative Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 12-32). Routledge.

The author argues that while quantitative approaches are the norm in the field, while 'theory building' is primarily qualitative, qualitative researchers mainly develop and advance hypotheses. He adds that relatively few attempts have been made to record or determine the prominence of qualitative scholarly studies in criminology and criminal justice. The author argues that qualitative researchers are working hard to produce well-conceived, well-executed inductive research that can help formulate and broaden qualitative research theoretical proposals. It can also be stated that the results are being published and that senior qualitative scientists pass on their expertise and experience to the next generation of young scientists who will continue to pursue the ball. The author of this article aims to evaluate the relevance of quality-orientated research, profile the individuals and organizations, and consider the role of this analysis in our understanding of criminal conduct's causes and consequences. To do this, the author systematically reviews published work, including scholarly papers and Ph.D. theses.

Holt, T. J. (2014). Exploring strategies for qualitative criminological and criminal justice inquiry using online data. In Advancing Qualitative Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice (pp. 87-108). Routledge.

The author argues that the foundation of the criminological discipline is empirical evaluations of deviance and crime. He argues that there has been a growing focus on using sophisticated statistical methods to conduct quantitative investigations into victims and criminals in recent years. He says that despite the central role of conventional quality studies on road crime and offending in many early explorations of corruption and deviation in urban environments, it is less prevalent in the field. However, he concludes that qualitative research in criminology has resurged in the past two decades. Since the mid-80s, various studies have used the internet and computerized communication (CMC) advancement and acceptance to better understand people's behavior.

Copes, H., Beaton, B., Ayeni, D., Dabney, D., & Tewksbury, R. (2020). A content analysis of qualitative research published in top criminology and criminal justice journals from 2010 to 2019. American journal of criminal justice, 45(6), 1060-1079.

The author argues that with the development of qualitative research in criminal science and criminal justice (CCJ) fields, it is crucial to investigate disciplinary standards and perceptions about how qualitative information is captured, interpreted, and presented. He argues that this analysis aims to assess qualitative research from 2010 to 2019 in 17 top CCJ newspapers. The author had found that the number of quality papers published increased in the past couple of decades, but the share of all articles remained constant. In 11.3 percent of all publications published in 17 CCJ journals, qualitative methods have been employed during this period. Moreover, the author has general approach guidance and performance presentation. The results provide insights into disciplinary standards and goals and marked fields of concern for methodological accountability and little respect (such as victims).

Lysova, A., Hanson, K., Hines, D. A., Dixon, L., Douglas, E. M., & Celi, E. M. (2020). A qualitative study of the male victims' experiences with the criminal justice response to intimate partner abuse in four English-speaking countries. Criminal justice and behavior, 47(10), 1264-1281.

The author argues that victims of intimate partner violence rely heavily on the criminal justice system for their well-being (IPA). He argues that most penal justice changes have been implemented in response to IPA to strengthen the care of abused women and children over the last 40 years. However, the evidence suggests that IPA affects a large number of persons. He adds that the perspectives of 38 men who were victims of the criminal justice systems in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States were investigated in this qualitative analysis. In 12 online focus groups, the inductivity of the themes at the semantic level was calculated (three in each country). The author argues that thematic analysis revealed that much of his experience had been hostile and reflected the gender concept embedded in the criminal justice system. In the battle against IPA, the author emphasizes the importance of a gender-inclusive criminal justice response.

Copes, H., Tewksbury, R., & Sandberg, S. (2016). Publishing qualitative research in criminology and criminal justice journals. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(1), 121-139.

The author argues that most publications in criminal justice and criminology include a quantitative observational approach. In reality, only about 5% to 10% of the papers published in CCJ journals use qualitative methods. Fortunately, he says that the trend seems to be changing throughout the discipline, allowing more researchers to carry out qualitative publication studies. Our objective is to provide realistic advice to increase its chance of successful structure, compile, and format manuscripts through qualitative approaches. The author discusses the importance of paying attention to the organization, choosing the correct journals for the manuscript to be sent, and how manuscripts can be correctly formatted and revised.

Churchill, D. (2018). What is historical criminology? Thinking historically about crime and justice. British Society of Criminology Newsletter, 82, 8-11.

The author states that in several sizes and forms, criminology is available. Comparative crime, critical criminology, feminist criminology, realistic criminology, and cultural criminology are to be listed. A new form of criminology known as "historical criminology" was given more emphasis in recent years. The author adds that the expanded use of this concept does not reflect substantial epistemological progress: current historical research on crime and justice from other disciplines and criminal justice has a long history of recorded work. However, the author emphasizes that sentence, however suggests that historical researchers are more mindful of their broader crime fields. It appears that the time is right to investigate further – and critically investigate – the scope, importance, and significance of historical research in criminology, so that its potential can be more sophisticated and nuanced. The author argues that a greater understanding of historical criminology and a distinct emphasis on historical criminology can help define and maximize historical research contribution to criminology. He adds that another way to put it is that it appears to be time to put "historical criminology" on a more stable footing - to explain what it could mean for our understanding of crime and justice. The author concludes that asking what it means to think historically about crime and justice is the most fruitful way to understand and advance historical criminology (Churchill 2018). The author says he would avoid mixing historical crime with a particular type of analysis or theoretical stability by asking about this issue. So, what does it mean to think historically? There is insufficient space to address this question fully, but the historical investigation scope may be considered an exceptional involvement in time. He adds that a wide range of researchers deals with time, from the experimental science watch to the time difference the anthropologist faces (Fabian 1983).

Biblical world view on Qualitative Inquiry

According to first Samuel, chapter twenty-two verse fifteen states that "Did I then begin to inquire of God for him? be it far from me: let not the king impute [any] thing unto his servant, [nor] to all the house of my father: for thy servant knew nothing of all this, less or more". (King James Bible, 1769/2017). This verse portrays how qualitative inquiry is used in the Bible in narration methods.

Conclusion

Finally, a list of possible drawbacks on how they contribute to criminal justice and the overview of various studies. It is common to experience some of the similarities and differences in the five approaches to determine which qualitative researchers are best suited to studying. Several government departments and agencies are part of the criminal justice system. While quantitative approaches are the norm in the field, while 'theory building' is primarily qualitative, 'qualitative researchers mainly develop and advance hypotheses. Most publications in criminal justice and criminology include a quantitative observational approach. Qualitative researchers are trying to understand their actions and interactions, and he starts by describing his connections to research.