Which critical reading and response processes do you most often use? Are there any processes that you've never used? What were the effects of not completing those processes? What can you do differently in the future? How does critical thinking and reading for comprehension contribute to effective writing? Give some examples from your own experiences.

Answer:

I recall and review my work very often on my own. This is the kind of critical reading and response processes which I most often use. It enables me to think out of the box and conclude on my approach to do things in a better fashion. I also tend to improvise upon my work as i proceed ahead to do better in life. If this process is not completed, then i personally feel that the quality of my work is not up to the mark and it sounds very half hearted. I do not gain confidence in my work. In the future i would try to be more conceptual and crisp in my approach so that i land to the conclusion without rushing around the bushes. The critical thinking and reading for comprehension contribute to effective writing. It enables us to think out of the box and establish that one to one connect with the writer and his version. Once we were given an assignment in the class to interpret the author's feelings. The entire class gave it one read and submitted the paper. But i knew it is not straighforward and there are other components to it as well. I read it again until i was satisfied and then wrote my version after critically evaluating all the criteria. I scored the highest in the exam and most of the class failed at concluding the right thing.