question archive A monopoly could theoretically earn negative profits in the short run, due to shifting demand -- but in the long run, such a firm would shut down, and therefore no monopoly would exist
A monopoly could theoretically earn negative profits in the short run, due to shifting demand -- but in the long run, such a firm would shut down, and therefore no monopoly would exist
Subject:EconomicsPrice: Bought3
A monopoly could theoretically earn negative profits in the short run, due to shifting demand -- but in the long run, such a firm would shut down, and therefore no monopoly would exist.
A monopoly maximizes profit by choosing the quantity where Marginal Revenue (MR) = Marginal Cost (MC). In the short-run, if this quantity has an Average Total Cost (ATC) greater than the corresponding price on the demand curve, then the firm would earn negative profit ([Price - Average Total Cost] x Quantity).
I am not aware of any practical examples of this type of situation, but it's a great question -- and I would love to see an example, if anyone has one. I think the closest example might be a monopoly that becomes obsolete with the development of a new technology or substitute product. By definition, no substitutes exist for a monopoly, so the monopoly would cease to exist just as it might experience a loss.
