question archive In 1987, Florida became a "shall issue" concealed carry state, which opened a floodgate of states who adopted similar laws
Subject:LawPrice:3.86 Bought7
In 1987, Florida became a "shall issue" concealed carry state, which opened a floodgate of states who adopted similar laws. Currently, all 50 states allow some form of concealed carry. This has brought attention to many theories of self-defense and defense of others.
1.
The castle doctrine and "stand-your-ground"
Stand Your Ground
Stand your ground provides that people may use deadly force
35 states are stand-your-ground states, 27 by statutes providing
Of these, at least ten include "may stand his or her ground" language (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina.) Pennsylvania limits the no-duty-to-retreat principle to situations where the defender is resisting attack with a deadly weapon.
Castle Doctrine
The common law principle of "castle doctrine" says that
Depending on the location, a person may have a duty to retreat to avoid violence if one can reasonably do so.
Castle doctrines lessen the duty to retreat when an individual is assaulted within one's own home.
Deadly force may either be justified, the burdens of production and proof for charges impeded, or an affirmative defense against criminal homicideapplicable, in cases "when the actor reasonably fears imminent peril of death or serious bodily harm to him or herself or another".
The castle doctrine
Justifiable homicide, in self-defense which happens to occur inside one's home is distinct, as a matter of law, from castle doctrine because the mere occurrence of trespassing and occasionally a subjective requirement of fear is sufficient to invoke the castle doctrine, the burden of proof of fact is much less challenging than that of justifying a homicide in self-defense.
With justifiable homicide in self-defense, one generally must objectively prove to a trier of fact, against all reasonable doubt, the intentin the intruder's mind to commit violence or a felony.
Other states with strong Castle Doctrine and stand-your-ground laws include:
Where castle doctrine may apply ?
2. The morality of self-defense
Nehemiah
It has always been clear that human life is precious so precious, in fact, that throughout time God has mandated the ultimate penalty for unlawful killing.
Among God's first words to Noah after the Flood subsided was this declaration of the importance of human life and the price paid for spilling human blood: "Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image." (Genesis 9:6)
This statement is not made to a nation-state or to a police force but instead to a small band of people who are rebuilding human society from the ground up.
While obviously not specifically addressing self-defense, by establishing that fundamental principle the Biblical commands and examples that follow demonstrate how God expects us to protect life in the real world.
In the Hebrew Bible, Exodus 21:12 states that "whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death." In Matthew's Gospel, Jesus, however, rejects the notion of retribution when he says "if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also."
Can one reconcile saving his/her own life at the expense of another's life from a.The Bible regarding self-defense and murder are a little contradictory in my view.
Exodus 22:2-4
He should make full restitution; if he has nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft. If the theft is certainly found alive in his hand, whether it is an ox or donkey or sheep, he shall restore double."
This portion deals with the consequences of thievery. First mentioned is the thief who is caught in the very act of breaking into someone's home (or business).
Verse 2 with verse 3, we realize that verse 2 is speaking of a thief that breaks in during the night, under cover of the darkness. If someone, while defending his property, should happen to kill the thief, there has no crime been committed so there would be "no guilt for his bloodshed."
In the Bible, there are different words used for a thief and a robber. The word 'thief' means 'a stealer.' The word 'robber' means 'a tyrant, destroyer, ravenous.' A thief would present no physical danger while a robber would be a threat.
In the darkness of night, a homeowner could not tell if the thief was a threat. He could not tell if he had a weapon or not, so if he killed the thief, thinking that he was a robber, there would be no prosecution.
Self-defense" is not even listed as a possibility!
However, when there is intent to kill or injure, God's law defines it as murder regardless of what the other person was threatening to do, about to do, or in the process of doing: "He who strikes a man so that he dies shall surely be put to death" (Exodus 21:12).
If a man fires a gun with the foreknowledge that it has the potential to kill another man, it is murder. The "self-defense" category is something afforded by the law of the land, not by the law of God.
4. Western culture no longer takes seriously many of the Ten Commandments. The third and fourth commandments are certainly neglected.
There is also a good argument that our society does not care much about the prohibitions against adultery (seventh commandment), theft (eighth commandment), slander (ninth commandment), or covetousness (tenth commandment) either.
However, apart from abortion and euthanasia, there is no movement to legalize murder.
In the modern West, people still want to hold that killing an innocent human being is wrong.
As we look at the sixth commandment, notice first that the ESV uses the word "murder," not "kill."
Not every kind of killing is murder, which means that not all acts of killing are against God's law.
Exodus 22:2-3
for examples
Over the centuries, Christians thinkers have seen a broader application of passages such as Exodus 22:2-3 to warfare, teaching that there are just wars in which Christians may participate and that states may wage war without violating the sixth commandment.
Generally speaking, just war theory says that states may defend themselves against unlawful aggression in order to protect their people and territories.
Sadly, nations do not always follow these guidelines, and tragically, the scourge of abortion on demand means that many countries do not take seriously the command not to allow the killing of innocent human beings.
Christians are obliged, insofar as they are able, to hold the state to account for not fulfilling its responsibility to protect life (Rom. 13:1-7).