question archive Why does Øyvind Strømmen (GPB 34, 292-293) find the historicity of the resurrection narratives problematic? What are some of the biblical texts Strømmen references to support his argument? He does not reference 1 Corinthians 12:27 specifically, but does it relate? Must one understand the resurrection to have been literal in order for it to be a profoundly important event?

Why does Øyvind Strømmen (GPB 34, 292-293) find the historicity of the resurrection narratives problematic? What are some of the biblical texts Strømmen references to support his argument? He does not reference 1 Corinthians 12:27 specifically, but does it relate? Must one understand the resurrection to have been literal in order for it to be a profoundly important event?

Subject:ReligionPrice: Bought3

Why does Øyvind Strømmen (GPB 34, 292-293) find the historicity of the resurrection narratives problematic? What are some of the biblical texts Strømmen references to support his argument? He does not reference 1 Corinthians 12:27 specifically, but does it relate? Must one understand the resurrection to have been literal in order for it to be a profoundly important event?

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE