Give a specific example of how an ROI method (or the ROI methods in general) might lead a manager to make a poor decision.

 

Consider the accompanying theoretical circumstance whenever a director is confronted with two venture openings that give the organization an alternate pace of profits. The speculation sum, the return, and the ROI appear in the accompanying "Table A".

On the off chance that the director considers just the RoI figure, she should choose Opportunity-1. Be that as it may, this can prompt a helpless choice. For all cases, there will be a gauge for a normal return also. This is like the normal return for a value holder which we consider in the expense of value. For instance, think about that there is a 15% anticipated return (at the end of the day, the chief had an occasion to put resources into an elective venture which gives a 15% acquiring opportunity). The Economic Value Added (EVA) return can be figured by deducting the normal get back from the real return. The calculation appears in the accompanying "Table B".

Presently, see that thinking about the EVA, the Opportunity-2 appears to be more alluring. This is the genuine result of the two open doors as it shows how much extra pay over a 15% return (which was ensured) can be created. In the event that the administrator sticks to RoI as the exhibition measures, she will pick some unacceptable open door by settling on an imperfect choice.

Please see the attached file for the complete solution