What is the consequentialist justification for laws that give ownership and control of software to individuals or corporations (proprietary software)?

What is the basic dilemma in giving individuals the ownership and control of software they wrote? Is there any alternative to working with privately-owned (proprietary) software?

 

Answer:

What is the consequentialist justification for laws that give ownership and control of the software to individuals or corporations?

The legislation should consider and protect IP because of the positive effects, according to impact-based claims in support of IP protection.

In a matter of political philosophy, the rights of writers in their works should be covered under the law, which does not mean that there is a moral justification for any particular body of IP law.

There are also unallowable avenues to try to reach a spiritual goal. For this reason, the question of the moral justification of IP law as currently worded is different from whether States ought to preserve these interests.

There have been several elements of the existing IP law, which have received sharp criticism from theoreticians that seem to accept at least some IP protection. The overall question of the moral justification of law protection for IP rights is several from the more private issue of a particular body of IP law being purely justified.

What is the fundamental dilemma in giving individuals the ownership and control of software they wrote?

 Organizations may assign the 'Software Champion' to the specialist or heavy user of some software and giThisals the ownership and control of software.

 In fact, this means that the user is responsible for managing any license or maintenance renewals, is in contact with any licensing issues relating to the software, and, in some cases, it may also participate in the approval process for all new applications.

A profound impact on human behavior can be the adoption of new technologies. New technologies provide us with skills that we didn't have before, generating environments and circumstances which are not directly tackled.

Is there any alternative to working with privately-owned software?

In privately-owned software, Digital technology has allowed us to combine data to create profiles of people from multiple sources. What weeks of work in the past would have taken can now be completed in seconds that allow private companies and governments to learn more about people than ever before. This knowledge is of interest, but it also promotes customer and citizen security.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/asi.20853