question archive The  reading for this week includes the following statement: "It is  emphasized that scientists, through their investigations, do not prove  anything" (GCU, 2014)

The  reading for this week includes the following statement: "It is  emphasized that scientists, through their investigations, do not prove  anything" (GCU, 2014)

Subject:PsychologyPrice: Bought3

The  reading for this week includes the following statement: "It is  emphasized that scientists, through their investigations, do not prove  anything" (GCU, 2014). A similar statement was made in an open letter to  the editor of Science: "There is always some uncertainty associated  with scientific conclusions; science never absolutely proves anything"  (Glieck, et al., 2010). While technically true when considering the  scientific method, it may be more beneficial to employ a graduated  approach by classifying scientific information as "proven, evolving,  [or] borderline science" (Moghissi, Amin, & McNulty, 2010).

Read  the article, "Does Science Never Absolutely Prove Anything?" Then  consider the theory of evolution. Do you consider the theory of  evolution proven, evolving, or borderline science? Must be 5-7 complete sentences.  Support your answer.

  •  

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions