question archive NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists Criteria Ratings Pts Two substantive research articles <br> (one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies
NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists Criteria Ratings Pts Two substantive research articles <br> (one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies
Subject:NursingPrice: Bought3
NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists
Criteria Ratings Pts
Two substantive research articles <br> (one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies.
10 to >8.9 pts
Two quality, substantive articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are suitable original research studies.
8.9 to >7.5 pts
Two articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are mostly substantive, but at least one is not a suitable original research study, or is not sufficiently substantive.
7.5 to >5.9 pts
One article is selected and identified as qualitative or quantitative research, or it is not a suitable original research study.
5.9 to >0 pts
Articles are not original research; one qualitative and one quantitative article are not identified.
/ 10 pts
Description of the research problem and purpose of each research article
40 to >35.6 pts
The research problem and the purpose for each article are expertly examined.
35.6 to >30 pts
The research problem and the purpose for each article are adequately examined with minor omissions or errors.
30 to >23.6 pts
The research problem and the purpose for each article are vague, absent or not identified, and contain major omissions or errors.
23.6 to >0 pts
The research problem and its purpose are not identified for any of the articles.
/ 40 pts
Description of the research methods for each research article
30 to >26.7 pts
An extensive description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is clearly presented for each article.
26.7 to >22.5 pts
An adequate description of the, variables, the sample, and the research methods is presented for most articles with minor omissions or errors.
22.5 to >17.7 pts
An unsatisfactory description of the variables, sample, and the research methods is presented for both articles with major omissions or errors.
17.7 to >0 pts
A description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is not presented for any of the articles.
/ 30 pts
Summary of the findings/conclusions/themes for each research article
40 to >35.6 pts
An expertly examined investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is skillfully presented for each article.
35.6 to >30 pts
An adequate investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both is satisfactorily presented with minor omissions or errors.
30 to >23.6 pts
An unsatisfactory investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is provided with major omissions or errors, or only one of the articles is investigated and presented satisfactorily.
23.6 to >0 pts
A description of the findings, themes, and conclusions, is not presented for either article.
/ 40 pts
Description of the similarities and differences among the research articles
60 to >53.4 pts
The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is clear and thorough.
53.4 to >45 pts
The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is adequate with minor omissions or errors.
45 to >35.4 pts
The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is inadequate with major omissions or errors.
35.4 to >0 pts
The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is not provided.
/ 60 pts
APA
10 to >8.9 pts
Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources with only 1–2 errors. Sources are expertly cited and are peer-reviewed, relevant sources. Meets all formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.
8.9 to >7.5 pts
Uses APA Style with minor citation violations with 3–4 errors. Sources are somewhat relevant, but may be limited in scholarly nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.
7.5 to >5.9 pts
Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with 5–6 errors. Sources are not cited, or there are many errors. Sources are not scholarly in nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.
5.9 to >0 pts
Does not use APA Style, or there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.
/ 10 pts
Mechanics
10 to >8.9 pts
The writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and information; and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors.
8.9 to >7.5 pts
The writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness, includes sufficient details, and is well organized, but it may contain a few errors. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with not many errors.
7.5 to >5.9 pts
The writing lacks clarity or conciseness, contains numerous errors, and lacks organization. Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper
5.9 to >0 pts
The writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; and is poorly organized. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.
