question archive NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists Criteria Ratings Pts Two substantive research articles <br> (one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies

NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists Criteria Ratings Pts Two substantive research articles <br> (one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies

Subject:BusinessPrice: Bought3

NURS350-Literature Review with Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists

Criteria Ratings Pts

Two substantive research articles <br> (one qualitative and one quantitative) are clearly identified as original research studies.

10 to >8.9 pts

Two quality, substantive articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are suitable original research studies.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

Two articles (one qualitative and one quantitative) are selected and are mostly substantive, but at least one is not a suitable original research study, or is not sufficiently substantive.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

One article is selected and identified as qualitative or quantitative research, or it is not a suitable original research study.

5.9 to >0 pts

Articles are not original research; one qualitative and one quantitative article are not identified.

/ 10 pts

Description of the research problem and purpose of each research article

40 to >35.6 pts

The research problem and the purpose for each article are expertly examined.

35.6 to >30 pts

The research problem and the purpose for each article are adequately examined with minor omissions or errors.

30 to >23.6 pts

The research problem and the purpose for each article are vague, absent or not identified, and contain major omissions or errors.

23.6 to >0 pts

The research problem and its purpose are not identified for any of the articles.

/ 40 pts

Description of the research methods for each research article

30 to >26.7 pts

An extensive description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is clearly presented for each article.

26.7 to >22.5 pts

An adequate description of the, variables, the sample, and the research methods is presented for most articles with minor omissions or errors.

22.5 to >17.7 pts

An unsatisfactory description of the variables, sample, and the research methods is presented for both articles with major omissions or errors.

17.7 to >0 pts

A description of the variables, the sample, and the research methods is not presented for any of the articles.

/ 30 pts

Summary of the findings/conclusions/themes for each research article

40 to >35.6 pts

An expertly examined investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is skillfully presented for each article.

35.6 to >30 pts

An adequate investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both is satisfactorily presented with minor omissions or errors.

30 to >23.6 pts

An unsatisfactory investigation of the findings, themes, and conclusions for both articles is provided with major omissions or errors, or only one of the articles is investigated and presented satisfactorily.

23.6 to >0 pts

A description of the findings, themes, and conclusions, is not presented for either article.

/ 40 pts

Description of the similarities and differences among the research articles

60 to >53.4 pts

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is clear and thorough.

53.4 to >45 pts

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is adequate with minor omissions or errors.

45 to >35.4 pts

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is inadequate with major omissions or errors.

35.4 to >0 pts

The description of the similarities and differences among the research articles is not provided.

/ 60 pts

APA

10 to >8.9 pts

Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources with only 1–2 errors. Sources are expertly cited and are peer-reviewed, relevant sources. Meets all formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

Uses APA Style with minor citation violations with 3–4 errors. Sources are somewhat relevant, but may be limited in scholarly nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with 5–6 errors. Sources are not cited, or there are many errors. Sources are not scholarly in nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

5.9 to >0 pts

Does not use APA Style, or there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment.

/ 10 pts

Mechanics

10 to >8.9 pts

The writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and information; and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors.

8.9 to >7.5 pts

The writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness, includes sufficient details, and is well organized, but it may contain a few errors. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with not many errors.

7.5 to >5.9 pts

The writing lacks clarity or conciseness, contains numerous errors, and lacks organization. Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper

5.9 to >0 pts

The writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; and is poorly organized. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.

/ 10 pts

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions