CONCERNED CASE IS :  Tucker Graphics v

Subject:EconomicsPrice: Bought3

Share With

CONCERNED CASE IS :  Tucker Graphics v. Nihon Ichiban

My client is: Nihon Ichiban Nihon Ichiban

Assigment:

Each student with a last name beginning with the letter A-H is to post their proposed answers on behalf of their client- Nihon Ichiban

Due to the number of students in the course there are two [2] Tucker Graphics and two [2] Nihon Ichiban teams. Tucker Graphics Team one should direct their responses to Nihon Ichiban Team One. Tucker Graphics Team Two should direct their responses to Nihon Ichiban Team Two. There is only one arbitral team and all four teams should provide the arbitrators with their respective responses.

The arbitrator team will review the materials, the questions and answers submitted by the teams and shall prepare a decision as to which team should win from Group One and Group Two. The outcome is not preordained and the arbitrators should review each Group's responses separately and come to a separate decision.

Each team [Tucker Graphics and Nihon Ichiban teams] should prepare and email to other team, arbitrators and instructor by midnight on Sunday, September 30th:

A list of witnesses the team intends to present to the arbitral panel [not more than 4 witnesses];

A brief synopsis [1-2 sentences] of what each witness will say;

Questions of the other party [you can be creative in who you want to question [may not question more than 3 persons nor ask more than 3 questions of each person – simple questions not multi-part]

its Demand on the other party [desired outcome, reasons your team should win and damages requested of arbitrators] [not to exceed five [5] bullet points