This distributive justice focuses on consequences or outcomes, what would the justice system provide to achieve justice for a murder crime? Try to answer these questions: What are the outcome agreements or contract. What is the goal of these agreements? What are the outcomes for victims and offenders? What is the reparation offered by the offender to the victim and the community?

 

For the crime of murder, distributive justice can basically provide justice and equality for capital crimes such as murder. Three theories-describing and applying Rawls' justice, utilitarianism and luck egalitarianism build walls of distributive justice. Therefore, the punishment of the principle of distributive justice should be stipulated fairly, so that the crimes committed, regardless of their moral value, should receive the same punishment for mistakes. Therefore, the issue of fairness and fairness extends from the negotiation process to the result, until the implementation stage. The agreements in this collection show that the concepts of justice and fairness contain multiple principles, and each stage is different. Every negotiation and agreement that is undertaken should aim to establish fairness and justice among the victims.

They should create equal space in trials in order to achieve fairness and justice. The staged negotiation concept provides a perspective for understanding the concept of justice from a linear path: interaction before negotiation promotes justice in the process, thereby increasing the chances of reaching a stable agreement. Another concept is to look at negotiations from a systematic perspective. This view captures the two-way and cyclical effects of justice variables.

The result of the victim is getting a fair trial for the murder, and the result of the criminal is being punished for the crime they committed. The punishment may be imprisonment or even more complicated than these. Compensation from the offender to the victim and the community only occurs when the offender is punished for the crime committed. After the punishment, the community is happy to avoid personal improvement at all costs. Suspected of this crime again.

Step-by-step explanation

When all residents living in the community are convinced of the basic level of commodities, get more commodities and get the same amount of commodities under the same workload, distributive justice will be used in the community. Distributive justice is related to the fair distribution of resources in society. In social psychology, distributive justice is defined as perceived fairness, which is how group members distribute rewards and costs.

The focus of distributive justice is to deal with criminal offenses fairly, regardless of their moral value. Negotiation and judgment lead to an orderly solution to injustices. At the end of the trial, the Trial Chamber can order the convicted person to pay compensation to the convicted murder victim in different ways. Compensation may include fixed-term imprisonment or symbolic measures Normally, the court considers that it may be most suitable for the victim in a particular case, so it can compensate the individual. One of the advantages of collective compensation is that it can provide relief to the entire community and help its members rebuild their lives, such as establishing victim service centers or taking symbolic measures. When it comes to community affairs, the crime of murder is always very sensitive, so the verdict is different depending on the decisions involved and adopted during the negotiation process.