What is the difference between protective and developmental republicanism, and how are the origins of each reflected in the ancient world?

 

The difference between developmental republicanism and protective republicanism is dependent on political participation. Developmental republicanism is based on the concept that there is fulfillment from political participation. It is a citizen's honor and duty to participate in politics and elections, and is based on the principle of equality of citizens as everyone has equal vote. This equal vote is essential in ensuring the common good is achieved. The origins come from Greek city-states, where political participation was seen as a citizens' duty, and everyone over a certain age can vote and run for political office.

Protective republicanism focuses on political participation with the goal of protecting personal liberty and freedoms. Citizens need to participate in the political system because it is the only way to protect themselves from an encroaching state or authority. Instead of a positive connotation of honor and duty, voting in protective republicanism is about maintaining status quo and safety. If they did not vote, they would be ruled by someone else. The roots of protective republicanism stems from Republican Rome.