Describe the process of a briefing. How does an analyst prepare? What key things must analysts

 remember when preparing? How should they construct and deliver their presentation? What

  types of presentation materials might they use?

Briefing is a written legal document used in various legal confrontation systems, which has been submitted to the court to discuss why one party to a case should prevail. There are several types of Briefing as follows; Pre-Trial briefs, Trial briefs, Legal briefs and Appellate briefs. The analysts prepare for Briefing by developing the catalogue lists the cited cases, laws and regulations and the authority table; state the issues that the court is reviewing, if possible, usually in one sentence; state the case statement in the lower court, explaining the relevant facts of the case and the past History; a summary of the legal review standards that the appellate court should use when evaluating lower court rulings; a summary of the party's views; and a full discussion of legal and/or policy arguments, explaining why the party believes it should win the case, which will be The longest part of the abstract.

The abstract may also be accompanied by appendices, which include copies of the opinions of lower courts and other documents or court opinions cited in the abstract. The required abstract format depends in particular on the procedural rules of the district court. Key things remembered when preparing a brief are Facts, Issue or issues, Holding, including the rule of law, Rationale.

The construction and delivery of the p[presentation is as follows;

1. Title and Citation - The title of the case shows who is against whom
2. Facts of the Case - A good Briefing will include a summary of the facts and legal points of the case. It will show the nature of the litigation, according to what happened and what happened in the lower courts, who sued whom.
3. Issues - Legal issues or questions arising from facts specific to the case are usually stated clearly by the court.
4. Decisions - A judgment or ruling is the court's answer to the issues involved, which is proposed by the parties or by the court itself while reading the case
5. Reasoning - Reasoning or argument is a chain of contention, leading to a majority or dissenting judge to rule as it is. It should be summarized point by point in numbered sentences or paragraphs.
6. Separate Opinions - Both agreed and dissenting opinions should be analyzed in the same depth to arrive at points that are consistent or opposed to the majority opinion.
7. Analysis - Here, Briefings should assess the importance of the case, the relationship between the case and other cases, its historical status, and the situation regarding the court, its members, its decision-making process, or its impact on litigants, the government or the society

Mostly, the type of materials they may use are CCTV footage, photographs, video, electronic facial imaging techniques and artist's impressions. Those are the major important components about briefings.

Step-by-step explanation

Briefings are written legal documents used in various legal confrontation systems, which have been submitted to the court to discuss why one party to a case should prevail. Briefings are divided into the following types: pre-trial summary, trial summary, legal summary and appeal summary. Analysts prepare for the briefing by compiling lists of cited cases, laws and regulations, and authority tables; if possible, usually use one sentence to state the issues that the court is reviewing; present the case statement in the lower court, explaining the relevant facts and past of the case A summary of the legal review standards that the appellate court should use when evaluating lower court rulings; a summary of the party's opinions; and a comprehensive discussion of legal and/or policy arguments explaining why the party believes it should win the case. This will be the summary The longest part in the abstract.

The abstract may also be accompanied by an appendix, which includes a copy of the opinion of the lower court and other documents or court opinions cited in the abstract. The required abstract format depends in particular on the procedural rules of the district court. The key things to keep in mind when writing an abstract are facts, issues or issues holdings, including the rule of law, and basic principles. The presentation is constructed and delivered as follows; Title and Citation-The title of the case indicates who is against whom the facts of the case-a good briefing will include a summary of the facts of the case and the main points of the law. It will show the nature of the lawsuit based on what happened and what happened in the lower courts and the purpose of who brought the lawsuit. The ruling is the court's answer to the questions involved, and it is made by the parties or the court itself while reading the case. Reasoning-Reasoning or arguments are a series of arguments that result in a majority or opposition judge making a ruling as it is. It should be summarized point by point in numbered sentences or paragraphs. Independent viewpoint-Both agree and disagree viewpoints should be analyzed at the same depth to arrive at a viewpoint that is consistent with or contrary to the majority viewpoint.

The summary or memorandum confirms the legal arguments of the parties and explains why the review court should confirm or overturn the judgment of the lower court based on legal precedents and references to control cases or statutory law. In order to achieve these goals, abstracts must appeal to recognized forces such as statutes or precedents, but can also include policy arguments and social statistics when appropriate. For example, if the law is vague or general enough to allow the appellant judge to have a certain degree of discretion in his decision, then the exploration of the consequences of possible judgments beyond legal formalism may provide guidance. If the purpose of the law in question may be clear, but the specific application of the law to serve that purpose is disputed, such arguments may also support legal arguments.