question archive Research on possible errors in death penalty cases have examined every capital case in the United States over a 22-year period (Liebman et al

Research on possible errors in death penalty cases have examined every capital case in the United States over a 22-year period (Liebman et al

Subject:PsychologyPrice:2.87 Bought7

Research on possible errors in death penalty cases have examined every capital case in the United States over a 22-year period (Liebman et al., 2000). It was found that 68% of death sentences were reversed because of serious errors at trial. All of the following were found to be the sources of these errors EXCEPT:

Group of answer choices

misleading jury instructions

misconduct of prosecutors

incompetent defense lawyers

incompetent judges or juries

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Answer:

A test that may emerge from the utilization of predictive analytics can be discovering a harmony among decency and inclination. With regards to the regular world, reasonableness alludes to people having equivalent admittance to conveniences and advantages. Nonetheless, reasonableness is regularly abstract and all things considered, it is only an inclination that we people get in light of boosts. Analysts contend that AI frameworks make investigations that are definitely more exact and less one-sided than people. Such is the idea driving predictive recidivism where calculations are utilized to evaluate a criminal litigant's probability of perpetrating a lawful offense. The issue in utilizing AI to help in condemning choices lies in the information that is being taken care of into it. At the point when the information, spoiled with human predisposition, is taken care of into the calculation at that point, normally, the AI additionally makes one-sided forecasts. For instance, we regularly catch wind of how African-American people are normally pre-dispositioned to submitting lawful offenses however that case has no logical information behind it. African Americans are not hereditarily pre-dispositioned to carrying out wrongdoings, there is no wrongdoing quality. It is human bias that these individuals are a survivor of, wherein they are decided by the shade of their skin and not by their activities. The fact is that when there is an amazing measure of cases including any minority because of police inclination, at that point the AI can just make models predicting these individuals to be the troublemakers of wrongdoing.

Related Questions