Scoring Rubric for Community Assessment Practicum Assignment   Criteria 7-10 points Excellent 5-7 points Average 0-4 points Poor Area Identified · Name of community · Geographic location of the community · State or territory · Rural, urban · Map included Clear, concise and complete Clearly sets a location for the community Map included of community Map included, but location information is incomplete, either on map or in slide notes Missing a map and/or location information Community Core · History · Ethnicity and Culture · Religion · Demographics All 4 sections are thoroughly researched, reviews relevant literature with no gaps in topic coverage For each section, research is obtained that relates as close to the defined community as possible (ie

Subject:NursingPrice: Bought3

Share With

Scoring Rubric for Community Assessment Practicum Assignment

Criteria	7-10 points Excellent	5-7 points Average	0-4 points Poor
Area Identified · Name of community · Geographic location of the community · State or territory · Rural, urban · Map included	Clear, concise and complete Clearly sets a location for the community Map included of community	Map included, but location information is incomplete, either on map or in slide notes	Missing a map and/or location information
Community Core · History · Ethnicity and Culture · Religion · Demographics	All 4 sections are thoroughly researched, reviews relevant literature with no gaps in topic coverage For each section, research is obtained that relates as close to the defined community as possible (ie. For a town county data is often more valuable than state or national data)	Partially reviews the 4 sections; reviews relevant literature with some gaps in topic coverage; 1 or more sections with limited information Analysis is unclear in some areas Local data not obtained when it is available to the general public	1 or more sections are missing Analysis is confusing and incomplete
Subsystems of the Community · Physical Environment · Health and Social Services · Economy and Safety · Transportation · Politics and Government · Local Public Health · Education · Recreation	All 8 sections are thoroughly researched, reviews relevant literature with no gaps in topic coverage For each section, research is obtained that relates as close to the defined community as possible (ie. For a neighborhood city or county data is often more valuable than state or national data)	Partially reviews the 8 sections; reviews relevant literature with some gaps in topic coverage; 1 or more sections with limited information Analysis is unclear in some areas Local data not obtained when it is available to the general public	1 or more sections are missing Analysis is confusing and incomplete
Interviews · 2-3 interviews minimum requirement · Interviews of stakeholders preferred   · Stakeholder: persons with a vested interest in the community such as long-term residents, business owners and government officials · Stakeholders provide different points of view than persons who only work in a community or who just moved in	At least 2 interviews are obtained Information on the participants is included (age, sex, work, length of residence etc. ) Interview information is not combined: it is easy in the final project to see the statements of each person interviewed At least 1 stakeholder interview included	At least 2 interviews were obtained, but unable to see the statements of each person interviewed   Information on participants not included No stakeholder interviews included Difficult to understand; wording is inconsistent and confusing	Under 2 interviews included
Analysis · Based on the assessment · Strengths of the community · Challenges of the community · Health needs of the community	Group perceptions included that are analytic and logical Identifies and describes strengths, challenges and/or health needs of the community that are related to information obtained in the community assessment	Briefly identifies and describes strengths, challenges and/or health needs Links to information in the windshield survey are unclear Some major strengths/challenges/needs identified in community assessment are not discussed	Analysis is missing Not linked to information obtained in the community assessment
Uses Scholarly Sources: · Assessment data from primary or scholarly/government source; best sources of evidence available General · Assignment is readable, makes sense, and the plan is practical and realistic · All assignment requirements are included · Is written in correct format · Slide notes accompany each slide, explaining the presented content. · Regardless of style: all resources are required to be listed in APA format	Multiple scholarly sources used for highest level of evidence In-text/on slide citations consistently seen in final work for source data Images and tables improve comprehension of topic No errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation and spelling No errors in APA formatting, in-text or on- screen citations and reference page Slide notes given for all slides except title pages	Few scholarly sources used in-text/on slide citations missing in many cases Few images used Some errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation and spelling but does not interfere with reading/understanding 1-2 errors in APA formatting, in-text or on-screen citations and reference page Many slides missing slide notes, or slide notes are incomplete and only partially address the content presented on the slide	Did not use scholarly resources and does not reference most of the sources used in the work Images cover text on slides or are inappropriately used Text is too small or difficult to read APA is not correctly used in format or citations Multiple spelling or grammar errors No slide notes attached

 

The Community Assessment Practicum Assignment is worth 15% of the total grade in the NUR 425 course

 

Total score: _____/60

 

Comments:

 

 

 

 

 

Syllabus – NRS450, updated: Jan. 2013 1

Community Assessment Scoring Rubric Updated 11/2018 2