Social Media Campaign Proposal - Working Bibliography

Instructions

Post a working bibliography (list of references) using APA format into the assignments folder with at least 4-5 scholarly sources. See note below about acceptable sources. For each reference, write 2-3 sentences  in your own words  that summarize the main point(s) of the source. Do not use quotations. Summaries that are not in your own words will not be graded and may be reported to the Office of Academic Integrity and Accountability for further investigation.

Rubric Name: Annotated Bibliography

Print Rubric

This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table.Criteria

Excellent

3 points

Good

2 points

Need Improvement

1 point

Missing or Not Acceptable

0 points

Criterion Score

APA Citation

Work is correctly cited and formatted in APA style with no errors in formatting, style, or information

Work is correctly cited and formatted in APA style with only one or two minor errors in formatting, style or information

Work is not correctly cited in APA style. There are several errors and/or important information omitted or the wrong style is used.

There is no APA citation or the APA style is incorrect.

Score of APA Citation,/ 3Criterion score has been overridden

Summary of source

The sources are clearly, accurately and concisely summarized. The main argument of the source is clearly stated and only important details are given.

The source summarized and the main argument is clearly stated. Some details are included.

The main argument of the source is not stated or not clear or inaccurately stated. No details are given or too many details are given.

Sources are not effectively summarized.

Score of Summary of source,/ 3Criterion score has been overridden

Analysis of source

Annotation concisely discusses several significant aspects of the methodology, disciplinary perspective, types of evidence or audience of the source. Its strengths or weaknesses are mentioned and how it might be useful or limited

Annotation discusses at least one significant aspect of the methodology, disciplinary perspective, types of evidence or audience of the source. Its strengths or weaknesses are mentioned and how it might be useful or limited.

Annotation fails to mention an important aspect of the source's methods, discipline etc. and/or does not in any way assess its quality or usefulness.

There is no analysis of the source

Score of Analysis of source,/ 3Criterion score has been overridden

Quality of sources

The source is reliable, credible and substantial and clearly would provide useful information on the topic for a scholarly investigation.

The source is reliable. It contains at least one demonstrably useful form of information for a scholarly investigation of the topic.

The source lacks credibility or is not substantial enough to be useful to a scholarly investigation of the topic.

The source is not reliable, credible, or substantial.

Score of Quality of sources,/ 3Criterion score has been overridden

Style and Technical correctness: paragraphs, etc

Elements of the annotation are smoothly integrated so it reads as a coherent whole.

There is obvious effort to integrate the elements of the annotation. There are some minor technical errors.

There are a number of technical errors that interfere with the paper's clarity and coherence. There are serious errors.

The paper is very difficult to read and lacks logic and organization.

Score of Style and Technical correctness: paragraphs, etc,/ 3Criterion score has been overridden

Rubric Total ScoreTotal

Score of Annotated Bibliography,/ 15Criterion score has been overridden

Overall Score

Overall Score

Excellent13.5 points minimum

Good12 points minimum

Needs Improvement9 points minimum

Poor0 points minimum

Top of Form

pur-new-sol

Related Questions