question archive In the 2015 NCAA infractions case involving Syracuse University, the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions found that head basketball coach Jim Boeheim did not adequately monitor his program or promote an atmosphere of compliance within his program
In the 2015 NCAA infractions case involving Syracuse University, the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions found that head basketball coach Jim Boeheim did not adequately monitor his program or promote an atmosphere of compliance within his program
Subject:BusinessPrice: Bought3
In the 2015 NCAA infractions case involving Syracuse University, the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions found that head basketball coach Jim Boeheim did not adequately monitor his program or promote an atmosphere of compliance within his program.
Please review the 2015 Syracuse University Infractions Report and the Head Coach Responsibility document and develop an initial response of about 150 words that addresses the following questions:
• What are the NCAA’s expectations for Division I head coaches as it relates to rules-compliance?
• Why did the NCAA Division I Committee on Infractions find Boeheim had not met the NCAA’s expectations?
• If you were a rules-compliance officer, how would you ensure your program’s head coaches were able to meet these expectations?
Support your statements with evidence from the required studies and your research. Cite and reference your sources in APA style.
