question archive Seminar & Presentation # Groups Seminar(Word) Score: 20 Presentation (PPT) Score: 20 Title Date of receiving Date of discussion Title Date of receiving Date of discussion 1 9 week 11 week Rating Systems in Evidence-Based Nursing Practice 8 week 10 week 2 Challenges for New Nurses Concerning Evidence-Based Nursing Practice 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Myths and Facts about Generalization 4 Nursing in the 20th and 21st centuries: New Approaches
Seminar & Presentation # Groups Seminar(Word) Score: 20 Presentation (PPT) Score: 20 Title Date of receiving Date of discussion Title Date of receiving Date of discussion 1 9 week 11 week Rating Systems in Evidence-Based Nursing Practice 8 week 10 week 2 Challenges for New Nurses Concerning Evidence-Based Nursing Practice 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Myths and Facts about Generalization 4 Nursing in the 20th and 21st centuries: New Approaches
Subject:NursingPrice: Bought3
Seminar & Presentation
|
# |
Groups |
Seminar(Word) Score: 20
|
Presentation (PPT) Score: 20
|
||||
|
|
|
Title |
Date of receiving |
Date of discussion |
Title |
Date of receiving |
Date of discussion |
|
1
|
|
|
9 week |
11 week |
Rating Systems in Evidence-Based Nursing Practice |
8 week |
10 week |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
Challenges for New Nurses Concerning Evidence-Based Nursing Practice |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Myths and Facts about Generalization |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Nursing in the 20th and 21st centuries: New Approaches. |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Critical appraisal of nursing research |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
Competency based distance nursing education: clinical teaching |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
Leading into The Future of Nursing |
|
|
Projects
|
# |
Groups |
Project (30) |
||
|
|
|
Title |
Date of receiving |
Date of discussion |
|
1 |
|
|
11 week |
13 week |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
Presentation Evaluation Criteria
Presenter’s Name:
Topic Name:
Date: -------------------------------------- Group: ------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Evaluation Items |
Mark |
Student’s Marks |
|
|
Category |
Items |
|
|
|
Content |
· The content is comprehensive and clear. · The content was organized in logical manner. · The presentation contained examples and useful techniques that applied to current work. · The content focused on major facts or ideas. · Speaker summed up main points in conclusion. |
5 |
|
|
Presenter |
· The presenter was knowledgeable about the topic and any related issues. · The presenter answered questions effectively. · The presenter was enthusiastic about the topic. · The presenter had a fluidity of language. · The presenter maintained the attention and interest of audiences. · The presenter appears prepared and understands the material. · The presenter summarizes when needed. |
7 |
|
|
Organization |
· The presenter delivered the material in a clear and structured manner. · Listener can follow line of reasoning. |
2 |
|
|
Presentation Style |
· Level of presentation appropriateness for the audience. · Presentation paced for audience understanding. · The presentation was concise and informative. |
3 |
|
|
Delivery |
· The presenter talks about the slides rather than simply reading them to the audience. |
3 |
|
|
Total |
20 |
|
Supervisor’s Name: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
