question archive Peer Feedback on Pitch Proposal Draft MGMT 3183: Entrepreneurship Review the proposals of the two other students that I have assigned you and provide them with constructive feedback by answering the following questions and completing the rubric (fill in the yellow parts)

Peer Feedback on Pitch Proposal Draft MGMT 3183: Entrepreneurship Review the proposals of the two other students that I have assigned you and provide them with constructive feedback by answering the following questions and completing the rubric (fill in the yellow parts)

Subject:BusinessPrice: Bought3

Peer Feedback on Pitch Proposal Draft

MGMT 3183: Entrepreneurship

Review the proposals of the two other students that I have assigned you and provide them with constructive feedback by answering the following questions and completing the rubric (fill in the yellow parts).

 

Your Name: Click or tap here to enter text.

 

Pitch #1

Pitcher’s Name: Click or tap here to enter text.

Criteria

Above Average

Average

Below Average

Points Awarded

Description of proposed business

14 to 20 points

7 to 13 points

0 to 6 points

 

 

Description of the business is thorough and clear; provides a good understanding of the product or service and suggests viability

Description of the business is somewhat difficult to understand or is lacking some aspects, leaving significant confusion and uncertainty; viability is uncertain

Description of the business is significantly lacking clarity and multiple aspects are missing, resulting in little or no understanding of the product or service and an inability to determine viability

Click or tap here to enter text.

Explanation of problem or opportunity

14 to 20 points

7 to 13 points

0 to 6 points

 

 

Clear identification and explanation of problem or opportunity and how the product or service will capitalize on it

Problem or opportunity is identified but not sufficiently explained; relationship of product or service with problem or opportunity is somewhat unclear

Problem or opportunity is not explained; relationship of product or service with the problem or opportunity is not explained

Click or tap here to enter text.

Explanation of target market

14 to 20 points

7 to 13 points

0 to 6 points

 

 

Target market, including existing or potential competitors, is identified and clearly explained

Target market and competitors are partially identified and/or insufficiently explained

Target market and competitors are largely unidentified and not explained

Click or tap here to enter text.

Funding model

10 to 15 points

5 to 9 points

0 to 4 points

 

 

Funding needed for venture is explained, including a description of sources of existing funding (e.g., own investment)

Funding needed for venture is only partially explained

Funding needed for venture is not addressed

Click or tap here to enter text.

Team members

7 to 10 points

4 to 6 points

0 to 3 points

 

 

Team members and their key roles are clearly identified

Team members are identified by key roles are not addressed

Team members and their roles are not addressed

Click or tap here to enter text.

Fluency and clarity

10 to 15 points

5 to 9 points

0 to 4 points

 

 

Proposal is written in clear, understandable language without errors

Proposal is mostly clear and understandable with minimal errors

Proposal has significant fluency and clarity problems with significant errors

Click or tap here to enter text.

· After reading this proposal, what questions do you have? What are you uncertain about?

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

· What do you feel are the strengths of this business? Of this proposal?

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

· What do you feel are the weaknesses of this business? Of this proposal? If possible, offer suggestions for how the author might shore these up.

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

· Do you see any neat twists or extensions that might strengthen this business further?

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

· Do a last check, have they covered the five required parts (description of the business, explanation of problem/opportunity, explanation of target market, funding needed, team members)? Any fluency or clarity problems?

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

 

Pitch #2

Pitcher’s Name: Click or tap here to enter text.

Criteria

Above Average

Average

Below Average

Points Awarded

Description of proposed business

14 to 20 points

7 to 13 points

0 to 6 points

 

 

Description of the business is thorough and clear; provides a good understanding of the product or service and suggests viability

Description of the business is somewhat difficult to understand or is lacking some aspects, leaving significant confusion and uncertainty; viability is uncertain

Description of the business is significantly lacking clarity and multiple aspects are missing, resulting in little or no understanding of the product or service and an inability to determine viability

Click or tap here to enter text.

Explanation of problem or opportunity

14 to 20 points

7 to 13 points

0 to 6 points

 

 

Clear identification and explanation of problem or opportunity and how the product or service will capitalize on it

Problem or opportunity is identified but not sufficiently explained; relationship of product or service with problem or opportunity is somewhat unclear

Problem or opportunity is not explained; relationship of product or service with the problem or opportunity is not explained

Click or tap here to enter text.

Explanation of target market

14 to 20 points

7 to 13 points

0 to 6 points

 

 

Target market, including existing or potential competitors, is identified and clearly explained

Target market and competitors are partially identified and/or insufficiently explained

Target market and competitors are largely unidentified and not explained

Click or tap here to enter text.

Funding model

10 to 15 points

5 to 9 points

0 to 4 points

 

 

Funding needed for venture is explained, including a description of sources of existing funding (e.g., own investment)

Funding needed for venture is only partially explained

Funding needed for venture is not addressed

Click or tap here to enter text.

Team members

7 to 10 points

4 to 6 points

0 to 3 points

 

 

Team members and their key roles are clearly identified

Team members are identified by key roles are not addressed

Team members and their roles are not addressed

Click or tap here to enter text.

Fluency and clarity

10 to 15 points

5 to 9 points

0 to 4 points

 

 

Proposal is written in clear, understandable language without errors

Proposal is mostly clear and understandable with minimal errors

Proposal has significant fluency and clarity problems with significant errors

Click or tap here to enter text.

· After reading this proposal, what questions do you have? What are you uncertain about?

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

· What do you feel are the strengths of this business? Of this proposal?

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

· What do you feel are the weaknesses of this business? Of this proposal? If possible, offer suggestions for how the author might shore these up.

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

· Do you see any neat twists or extensions that might strengthen this business further?

Click or tap here to enter text.

 

· Do a last check, have they covered the five required parts (description of the business, explanation of problem/opportunity, explanation of target market, funding needed, team members)? Any fluency or clarity problems?

Click or tap here to enter text.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE