question archive The principle of utility, as regards crime, posits that if the greater good of the community can be raised then it is justifiable to harm an individual more than otherwise would be the case
The principle of utility, as regards crime, posits that if the greater good of the community can be raised then it is justifiable to harm an individual more than otherwise would be the case
Subject:LawPrice:11.86 Bought3
- The principle of utility, as regards crime, posits that if the greater good of the community can be raised then it is justifiable to harm an individual more than otherwise would be the case. For you, what is the “greater good?” How can this be measured? What’s the “good”: lower crime or having more personal freedoms? In short, would it be a “greater” community if it had lower crime? Or, would it be a “greater” community if it had more due process protections and lesser punishments? In short, what concept should we use to measure the utility of punishment: crime or freedom and decency?
- Return to the board and read over the posts of your fellow classmates. Choose at least one classmate and create a post responding to his/her initial post on the Discussion Board. Be thoughtful in your response, indicating your agreement/disagreement with their posting and give a careful reasoning of your position
Anna DeSane Wednesday The greater good is both educating the individual and protecting the community from any wrong they may do. The greater good cannot be really measured but it can be judged accordingly to each situation. Each situation the evidence, the witness statements, and the background of the individual should all be taken into consideration when deciding what kind of punishment is necessary. The greater good is keeping the community safe, protecting them and keeping them in mind when deciding a punishment. The community would be a "greater" community without crime because all people would be safe and there would be no fear of something bad happening to them or someone they know. No, I think punishments are very important in teaching lessons and helping those who break the law become better people. Without punishments, no one would fear doing wrong things in risks of being penalized, therefore everyone would just do whatever they pleased. We should keep in mind the actions these individuals do because either way putting someone in jail isn't ideal, but it is necessary to keep both them and the community safe. The actions they have done to get them in this situation should not be forgotten.
Purchase A New Answer
Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts
GET A QUOTE
Answer Preview
Principle Utility
The greater good is to follow the principle of utility and take into account the contemplations of justice. The principle of utility advocates for actions and decisions made based the long-term happiness gained and higher pleasures. It involves the greater happiness to be on the majority of the people. This principle assumes that everyone’s happiness is equality and any action is right as long as it promotes happiness, thus the need to accounting the considerations of justice (Merry, 2018). These two; principles of utility and considerations of justice, can lower crime in a community. However, greatness cannot be measured but can be acquired. The principle of utility seeks to punish the guilty in order to discourage wrongdoing. Punishing crime will lower crime and make a community greater because of the sufficient peace available.
Response to Anne DeSane
I agree with you that the greater good is educating individuals and protecting the community from doing wrong, and that punishment is important in seizing crime. Educating people about crime will equip them with the knowledge about crime, the effects of crime, the feelings of the offended, and the punishments to crime. This education will reduce crime in a community because people will care about their partners’ feelings and the punishments will instill fear in them (Lochner, 2020). The community should be protected from crimes like ethnic, religious, discrimination, and domestic violence.
