question archive The following happened in regards to the contract withPeninsula Tours The agreement stipulated the provision of five cars with drivers every day Due to resignation of drivers and breakdown of some of the cars, Gareth informedPeninsula Toursthat he can only provide three cars per day while he recruits additional drivers Gareth goes ahead and gets the cars fixed and hires additional drivers He spent nearly $7000 However, after two months Peninsula Tours demanded payment of compensation for the two cars not provided totalling $1200 Is Gareth under legal obligation to pay the compensation? What ifPeninsula Tourschanges its mind and decides to take the three cars only after Gareth had spent considerable amount of money for fixing the two cars and hiring drivers? Discuss question is whether Gareth under legal obligation to pay the compensation?
The following happened in regards to the contract withPeninsula Tours The agreement stipulated the provision of five cars with drivers every day Due to resignation of drivers and breakdown of some of the cars, Gareth informedPeninsula Toursthat he can only provide three cars per day while he recruits additional drivers Gareth goes ahead and gets the cars fixed and hires additional drivers He spent nearly $7000 However, after two months Peninsula Tours demanded payment of compensation for the two cars not provided totalling $1200 Is Gareth under legal obligation to pay the compensation? What ifPeninsula Tourschanges its mind and decides to take the three cars only after Gareth had spent considerable amount of money for fixing the two cars and hiring drivers? Discuss question is whether Gareth under legal obligation to pay the compensation?
Subject:AccountingPrice: Bought3
The following happened in regards to the contract withPeninsula Tours The agreement stipulated the provision of five cars with drivers every day Due to resignation of drivers and breakdown of some of the cars, Gareth informedPeninsula Toursthat he can only provide three cars per day while he recruits additional drivers Gareth goes ahead and gets the cars fixed and hires additional drivers He spent nearly $7000 However, after two months Peninsula Tours demanded payment of compensation for the two cars not provided totalling $1200 Is Gareth under legal obligation to pay the compensation? What ifPeninsula Tourschanges its mind and decides to take the three cars only after Gareth had spent considerable amount of money for fixing the two cars and hiring drivers? Discuss
question is whether Gareth under legal obligation to pay the compensation?
