A) What is the difference between the founders, the scientists, and Chase, a professional manager, in managing IMV?

B) What structural change did Chase implement? What was the original structure and what structure did he change it to?

Answer:

A)

DIFFERENCE OF THE FOUNDERS, SCIENTISTS, THE NEW PROFESSIONAL MANAGER, AND CHASE INMANAGING IMV

The IMV was a great marketing strategy aimed at reaching a broader market than that in themotherland. The founders of TMC developed a management team, called the Toyota MotorManagement Service, in Singapore, which was aimed at lowering the cost of production.IMV highly depends on engineers and scientists to craft and design the products for the broadermarket, gain the necessary knowledge, and then transfer the knowledge to the broader marketaround the globe to meet the demand. The new professional manager in the IMV project's jobwas to ensure that the vision of reaching the global market and producing products where theywere needed was realized. The manager had to come up with a team to work hand in hand inThe chase came up with the structure of the IMV project, which was aimed at reaching the globalmarket and producing products that were more attractive and affordable to the consumer in termsof motor vehicles by Toyota.

B)

Structural change:

When it comes to economic theory, structural change is defined as a shift or change in the fundamental ways in which a market or economy functions or operates.

Among the factors that can cause change are economic development, global shifts in capital and labour, changes in resource availability as a result of war or natural disaster, the discovery or depletion of natural resources, and a change in political system, among others.

Employment has undergone structural changes:-

Changes in the economic structure have an impact on employment opportunities as well. Employment is concentrated in the primary sector of a developing economy, whereas employment is concentrated in the tertiary sector of an advanced/developed economy.

Examining econometric models for evidence of structural change:-

When it comes to economic hypothesis testing, structural change tests are a type of econometric hypothesis test that looks at structural change. They are used to ensure that the coefficients of a data set are the same across different subsamples of the same data set when comparing two different data sets.

Examples:

When it comes to natural systems, structural change has not always been entirely beneficial. The division of Korea, as well as the divergent paths of development taken by each of the three states, are excellent illustrations of this. Korea's economic structure was relatively uniform under Japanese rule, but following World War II, the two countries experienced drastically different structural changes as a result of their drastically different political structures, resulting in dramatically different structural changes.

Models of Economic Liberalization: Regime, Power, and Compensation in the Iberian-American Region is a book written by Sebastian Etchemendy. It is available on Amazon (2009). It was presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association in Toronto in 2009.

Capitalism's Structural Change and Growth, Structural Change and Growth in Capitalism, Structural Change and Growth in Capitalism The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore is a research institution.