Find an article published in the media (newspapers, magazines, television and/or their online equivalent) which discusses the issue nature vs nurture. After reading the article, you will write a 2-3-page paper with a summary of the article, a review of how it relates to at least one concept we have covered in class, discussion of how the article is important to the field of psychology, and ideas for future research in this area. In your paper, you will evaluate the usefulness of the article in terms of: how complete is the information, how credible is the source of the information, and the possible implications of the findings presented in the article

 

Nature vs. Nurture: Article Review

The article written by Barlow (2019) titled "Nature vs. nurture is nonsense: On the necessity of an integrated genetic, social, developmental, and personality psychology" is one of the most significant attempts to examine how psychological scholars approach and respond to the nature versus nurture debate. It is essential to examine and comprehend some of the key problems raised in this article in relation to this psychologically contentious subject and to debate their relevance, particularly in child development.

As the academics point out, nature vs nurture is difficult since it has not been proven what particular variables often influence how individuals grow and develop; whether they are external, intrinsic, or internal problems to which people are predisposed from birth. Additionally, the essay discusses the degree to which they influence human development, particularly psychological, moral, and emotional growth.

It's worth mentioning that the article's opening to this debate is very enticing and entirely believable. The author attempts to convince the audience using a variety of different types of evidence while keeping a completely impartial viewpoint before going into the actual argument as given by several scholars. While these may be well-established characteristics for certain groups or views from other schools of thought, many other psychological groups dispute this and maintain that genetics do not determine individuals. Rather than that, how children are raised and the encounters they have as they attempt to establish themselves within social and cultural contexts influence their behavior and personality. As previously said, this, however, continues to be a point of contention for a large community of scholars throughout the scholarly landscape.

Barlow (2019) goes into more detail on some of the recognized aspects that should be considered even when evaluating this topic objectively. To begin, no one can deny that societal influences have an effect on how individuals think. Barlow (2019) argues that we are who we are as a result of our interactions with others. This indicates that the families in which we are raised have an effect on where we end up. This is one of the most critical qualities mentioned in this essay and one that every psychologist or social scientist should consider while debating this contentious issue. Other critical facts mentioned in the article that support the idea that individuals are more influenced and behave as per the settings they get in their surroundings than their genetic composition is the persuasive effect of peer pressure. Irrespective of the perspective chosen, each of these factors plays a critical part in determining who a person is, and it is only fair that the article thoroughly analyzes them and provides factual evidence for why the hypothesis tests correctly.

While the term implies a preference for rejecting opposing views and points of view, it also addresses the manner in which genetic and societal variables influence human development. It is important to emphasize that no particular participant, sample, or community of human groups was used. A substantial portion of this article's content is based on a systematic review of secondary literature. The author devotes much time to several types of scientific studies that address the psychological position of nature vs nurture and how it may be evaluated objectively. Barlow (2019) argues that the technique used in a research, as well as the population and sample size used, have an effect on the final result and accuracy of the data gathered.

Another critical element to consider while reading the Nature Vs Nurture article is the results. It is stated that the first rule of behavioral genetics explains how our inner selves' approach influences who we are and who we develop into. The genetic tendency is well described by the adage "everything is heritable" (Barlow, 2019). While this viewpoint or tent may not always applicable, it is a frequently advocated concept among behavioral psychologists. It is the idea that our actions are dictated by factors over which we have no control and that we are "victims of circumstance." The nurture viewpoint maintains that many children who become delinquent, for example, do so not out of choice but because their line of ancestors may have inherited certain traits.

Critical Evaluation

While the methodology was not openly stated or explained in this article, readers may easily understand the methods utilized to acquire the results provided. I am certain that the hypothesis was evaluated via a thorough examination of secondary literature and that the result accurately represented the real situation. Additionally, I am certain that the conclusions reached were correct and were based on the study results summarized briefly in this debate. All conclusions were drawn from data gathered from the secondary literature on which the researcher based this study.

Ethics is a critical consideration for any researcher while addressing or studying various problems, particularly in the area of psychology, where studies may include very vulnerable people. Given the nature of this research, I would assert that all pertinent ethical concerns have been addressed. For example, the author has attempted to credit material gleaned from various sources to the original authors, giving this research maximum credence.

Outline

How the article is important to the field of psychology

Ideas for future research in this area. In your paper

Evaluate the usefulness of the article in terms of: how complete is the information, how credible is the source of the information, and the possible implications of the findings presented in the article